TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Wed 11 May, 2011 01.28
Mike.Anderton is surely heading for a ban? A DS style TV licence post and now an off-topic thread about Cameron.
TVF's London Lite.
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Wed 11 May, 2011 01.28
Pregnancygate on the Sky News Presenters & Rotas thread is becoming tiresome. Some think they're being 'told' what to say, but then don't have the common sense to understand why speculation over a colleague's private life is unacceptable.
If Skygeek leaves because of this nonsense and I fully understand his frustration with some of our more ignorant members, it'll be a big loss to the forum as most of us understand the unwritten rules of debating on the forum.
If Skygeek leaves because of this nonsense and I fully understand his frustration with some of our more ignorant members, it'll be a big loss to the forum as most of us understand the unwritten rules of debating on the forum.
TVF's London Lite.
-
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat 08 Nov, 2008 19.48
The one single thing that annoys me most on that argument is the view being put forward by some that because you're on TV everything you do is in public view - you suddenly don't have the right to a private life if you present the news.
They also don't seem to be able to see the difference between a couple like brangelina who have distantly courted the press to advertise themselves and someone who just reads the news.
It does worry me how they seem to input they have a sufficiently closer relationship with these people that they feel entitled to know every detail about their lives, just based on a bit of autocue reading and the odd ad-lib down a camera lens. Especially when they get stop defensive if someone calls them out on it.
They also don't seem to be able to see the difference between a couple like brangelina who have distantly courted the press to advertise themselves and someone who just reads the news.
It does worry me how they seem to input they have a sufficiently closer relationship with these people that they feel entitled to know every detail about their lives, just based on a bit of autocue reading and the odd ad-lib down a camera lens. Especially when they get stop defensive if someone calls them out on it.
-
- Posts: 2020
- Joined: Sun 13 Feb, 2005 00.04
- Location: Next door to Hell
On the whole I agree with you, but this one has been blown completely out of proportion.
- tillyoshea
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun 23 Nov, 2003 14.34
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
- Contact:
In response to Skygeek's weird claim that Sky News doesn't speculate on pregnancies and would only report on the breakdown of 4 specifically listed relationships (!), I made what I thought was a relatively innocuous post listing some of the many Sky News articles out of line with that position.
Genuinely laughed out loud to find myself "officially warned" over it... The drama! Made my day that after 13 years, I've finally become a certified TVF troublemaker! How long do I get to keep my badge for?
Genuinely laughed out loud to find myself "officially warned" over it... The drama! Made my day that after 13 years, I've finally become a certified TVF troublemaker! How long do I get to keep my badge for?
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Wed 14 Aug, 2013 14.53
I'll remind everyone at this point that I was banned because I said Top Gear was "no place for a woman."
Personal bias clearly got in the way.
Personal bias clearly got in the way.
Given that comment I'd say overt rather than casual, but the point still stands.woah wrote:Or perhaps it was your casual sexism. Yes, I think it was that.robschneider wrote:I'll remind everyone at this point that I was banned because I said Top Gear was "no place for a woman."
Personal bias clearly got in the way.
The fuckwits have won, and Skygeek has left.
Nice going people...
Nice going people...
