Metropol

Malpass93 wrote:There's a secret forum
I won't tell anyone, I swear.

That mere mention has caused panic, Malpass. The location is being moved as we speak, and I never even got in the front door. Black-balled through your indiscretion :roll:

Freshly pressed table cloths, doillies and neatly laid out silver cultery are being thrown into waiting trucks no doubt, together with a rather nice diamond encrusted dog basket.

I was so close: now I have to start at entry level once again:

"Hello Gavin"

Back to the topic, it has just come up on Calendar that an "alledged" BNP member has been attacked.

Are you happy now, all of you who said they deserve it?

Yawn.

Who exactly was that, The Great Ass? Have you read all the thread or just borrowed the Letts notes from the library like most students?

Malpass93 wrote:Back to the topic, it has just come up on Calendar that an "alledged" BNP member has been attacked.

Are you happy now, you who said they deserve it?

This is the worrying response now, aside from the attacks on these people: the danger is the supporters of BNP will be driven underground and nobody will know what they are up to.

As a legal organisation at least perhaps the security services knew what they were doing.

Alexia wrote:Yawn.

Who exactly was that, The Great Ass? Have you read all the thread or just borrowed the Letts notes from the library like most students?

I resent that, I have read through the article.

I believe you've missed out the "Malp" out of of "Malpass". Easy mistake to make, though.

This is exactly what I warned would end up happening. People taking the law into their own hands to get these BNP (or in some cases ex-BNP) members themselves. It can't help anyone, as innocents may get attacked in the crossfire, so to speak. Mistakes will be made, resulting in people with similar names to those on the list also being at risk. Ditto the families of the BNP members. They may also be targeted.

For the record, it was ShowbizGuru, earlier on in the thread.

To be honest, I have to say I am rather surprised by your comment, Alexia, as I have found myself agreeing with your points in this article 100%, almost as if we think the same things (on this article, of course).

Stuart* wrote: Had a one-2-one lecture from Mr Q? (takes 3 hours)

See, the fascinating thing about that is, I still think of myself as new around here.

And I can't think of the last 'lecture' I gave - I'm sure my comments have been somewhat shorter lately. But then time flies when you're sticking sharp pencils into your eyes while editing other people's work.

ShowbizGuru wrote:

Stuart* wrote:People have a right to protect their personal information. We cannot deny that the right of BNP members in that respect has been breached.

Absolute rubbish, privacy is NOT, repeat NOT, a right. You have the choice to get into this thing and you have to bear the consequences when they blow up in your face.

What two faced bastards to play the privacy card when they've been secretly supporting such views, they will get what they deserve and without threatening them I say I would not miss them if they were murdered.

If you want privacy, get it for yourself, DO NOT join parties and then say you just wanted it as your own dirty little secret!

I am curious - what rights do you believe exist, if any at all? If I set up a bank account, should I not have a reasonable expectation that the bank will not publicly broadcast my details? I would argue privacy is something that is quite fundamental to many of the decisions we make, and for that reason is generally preserved as a right in law.

Stuart* wrote:

Malpass93 wrote:There's a secret forum
I won't tell anyone, I swear.

That mere mention has caused panic, Malpass. The location is being moved as we speak, and I never even got in the front door. Black-balled through your indiscretion :roll:

Freshly pressed table cloths, doillies and neatly laid out silver cultery are being thrown into waiting trucks no doubt, together with a rather nice diamond encrusted dog basket.

I was so close: now I have to start at entry level once again:

"Hello Gavin"

Are you just hear to fill a quota of completely pointless tripe? I'd like to ask am I one of the 'two Jimmies' you speak of? Because I trust you'll probably remember a previous comment from me that said NO-ONE calls me Jimmy and gets away with it.

Isonstine wrote:Are you just hear to fill a quota of completely pointless tripe?
I'd like to ask am I one of the 'two Jimmies' you speak of?
Because I trust you'll probably remember a previous comment from me that said NO-ONE calls me Jimmy and gets away with it.

No
Yes, you are
, get over it !

Stuart* wrote:

Isonstine wrote:Are you just hear to fill a quota of completely pointless tripe?
I'd like to ask am I one of the 'two Jimmies' you speak of?
Because I trust you'll probably remember a previous comment from me that said NO-ONE calls me Jimmy and gets away with it.

No
Yes, you are
, get over it !

And who is this other 'Jimmy'? I need to know who I am being lumped in with...

Isonstine wrote:And who is this other 'Jimmy'? I need to know who I am being lumped in with...

There are only two James's I'm aware of on this board,but for your sake I'd hate to take that to its logical conclusion...