Page 8 of 9

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 00.24
by Dr Lobster*
Jamez wrote:Would you rather I step down, then?

(Even though I haven't actually done any moderating for about a week!)

yes.

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 00.26
by James H
cdd wrote:This is the hottest thread in the world - 7 pages in 24 hrs! Puts the News 24 relaunch to shame.
Random thread?

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 00.28
by cdd
Dr Lobster* wrote:
Jamez wrote:Would you rather I step down, then?

(Even though I haven't actually done any moderating for about a week!)

yes.
There you go James, the consensus has spoken :roll:

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 01.11
by iSon
James H wrote:That's twice you've accused somebody of something libellous though.

That's not adding "a bit of spice to the place".

It's accusing somebody else of something very wrong which I didn't see the provocation for in the first place (and yes, I've read the post in question).

You KNEW this was the reaction you were going to get but now it's a case of we're all talking about you in a bad way rather than a good way.

But a question to the rest of MP's members; what CAN Jamez do to redeem himself in your gorgeous eyes?
I don't like to fan flames here, but surely this is a VERY quick turnaround and change of opinion for Mr H?

Just a few hours ago he was saying we should leave Jamez alone, but since he's been put under the spotlight now seems to want some action to be taken.

Almost identical to the "I never report cat's post" remark after he realised that cat was a lot more popular and most people thought James H was a weak willed shit.

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 01.23
by James H
I was saying it was boring the constant attacking of James, but since this afternoon's posts I wanted to post something. After all the post was extremely horrid.

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 02.05
by Jamez
James H wrote:I was saying it was boring the constant attacking of James, but since this afternoon's posts I wanted to post something. After all the post was extremely horrid.
You probably didn't even know what List 99 was before today, so bugger off back under your rock.

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 11.06
by James H
Jamez wrote:
James H wrote:I was saying it was boring the constant attacking of James, but since this afternoon's posts I wanted to post something. After all the post was extremely horrid.
You probably didn't even know what List 99 was before today, so bugger off back under your rock.
Excuse me?

Some of us do have an education you know. Whereas your original use of List 99 sounds like a playground bully who's heard the phrase for the first time today and thought, "That's funny".

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 11.15
by Dr Lobster*
James H wrote: your original use of List 99 sounds like a playground bully who's heard the phrase for the first time today and thought, "That's funny".
i thought that too.

given his apparent willingness to accuse almost anybody of being a paedophile i'm suprised he didn't use that little snippet of knowledge long ago.

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 11.55
by Sput
Image

Interesting to note the appearance of this briefly.

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 11.57
by Dr Lobster*
when did that happen?

Posted: Sun 15 Jan, 2006 12.25
by Sput
When i was looking at this thread. Changed again when I came back to it though a few mins later. Might just have been a db glitch but it's odd.