Metropol

IdentFan2016 wrote:

PresIdents wrote:I know, I'm just saying that he is also often guilty of giving himself away.

Or you might just leave him alone, he's doing some good things and stuffs

Sherlock Holmes, at your service.

Cheers for proving my point, Callum.

IdentFan2016 wrote:

PresIdents wrote:

rob wrote:
Can't be Callum Precious. Dalek was capable of writing in perfect sentences, whereas Precious talks gibberish...

I know, I'm just saying that he is also often guilty of giving himself away.

Or you might just leave him alone, he's doing some good things and stuffs

Sherlock Holmes, at your service.

And asking for crap "stuffs" on Media.info too.

Callum once harassed me for episodes of the Gaelic dub of Little Monsters via YouTube when he could've just used get-iplayer himself..!

robschneider wrote:Cando in the Eurovision thread. WTF? And yes I did see what he/she wrote about me.

Your quite right.

What the frigg are you all prattling on about?

all new Phil wrote:What the frigg are you all prattling on about?

If this thread were ever to close, that should be thr final post.

Revitt is on a DS style bashing rampage against the Welsh.

FFS! More value chicken! Arughgiegiodfgiojdfgijodfgsjiosadgjklfgs

Ban hammer time!

Bit harsh!

Bit harsh? No?

It was the first thing that popped into my head when I saw barcode's typo, I guess it's just luck that I was at work, as there's been no indication it is a ban-able offence. Fair enough if you don't want it hanging around, but going from "yeah, that's enough of that" after the image hung around for weeks to instant 7-day ban is a bit OTT surely. IMHO there should have been fair warning.

It does seem harsh in comparison to the likes of 'James Bond' who didn't even get a warning for worse behaviour recently.