Metropol

...in other news, I see that Mr LuckyC's 'son' has reared his interest in CBBC again and we've discovered that in StephenBailey's books a presenter muddling two words is hilarious.

Apparently someone is going off their head about someone criticising their work.

And the bad part about it is if you look at the TV forum homepage, apparently it's me (AddictedToTVPres) saying that! But it's not!

FS Creative is going to be amazingly fun - ripping others off, placing it in some imaginary context and then become very defensive when people give him valid criticism. Furthermore, is there anything than Matthew Firth considers shite? His two major problems didn't even include the fact it was an ITV ident with a BBC logo placed over the ITV logo, which FS Creative had spent ages putting his hard work into. Personally, I can't wait 'till his next mock even if it happens to be my N8 recreation used as part of an ITV News rebrand.

In other news, has BBC News Fix become an insider or is he now just acting as one. I've noticed recently he's become very assertive about behind the scenes things,

HarryBNF wrote:

flaziola wrote:Regarding the gallery to use, if B is rehearsing Newsnight, E is rehearsing the 10 and C is broadcasting Business Edition, that only leaves Gallery A doesn't it?

Yep. So all of the Outside Source materials that are used on world are 'saved' on B's gallery and will be transferred to A's gallery.

If it is I hope he isn't speaking to his colleagues in the same way he writes about them on TVF, or TF as he'd write it.

https://twitter.com/_youhadonejob/statu ... 3101641731

TVF member perhaps?

DTV wrote:FS Creative is going to be amazingly fun - ripping others off, placing it in some imaginary context and then become very defensive when people give him valid criticism.

As demonstrated here.

70 years eh?

I see a select few members are continuing to turn the ITV thread into a rota thread for adverts. I do not see how the fact showed X promo twice but Y promo once is interesting.

Can I suggest a new feature for The Gallery. I've always thought it would be quite nice to be able to see a breakdown of the ratings votes, or even further with the actual names. Because I've always had a sneaky suspicion that some of the PowerPoint mock gang give perfectly reasonable 4/5 star mocks really low marks in order to drag averages down simply because some of the other TV Forumers have given perfectly reasonable criticisms of the mocks.

I beleive this happens aswell.

DTV wrote:Can I suggest a new feature for The Gallery. I've always thought it would be quite nice to be able to see a breakdown of the ratings votes, or even further with the actual names. Because I've always had a sneaky suspicion that some of the PowerPoint mock gang give perfectly reasonable 4/5 star mocks really low marks in order to drag averages down simply because some of the other TV Forumers have given perfectly reasonable criticisms of the mocks.

Though I suspect a feature request is probably better on TV Forum, having names displayed could end up with a lot of abuse flying around. A breakdown of the figures, though, is something I think is a good idea.

FS Creative has returned and has hijacked a thread.

Bloody lovely.