Metropol

dosxuk wrote:I'm not sure how many more of billy something's enlightening outbursts I can take.

JetixFann450's are even more annoying...

http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post932079#post-932079

rob wrote:

dosxuk wrote:I'm not sure how many more of billy something's enlightening outbursts I can take.

JetixFann450's are even more annoying...

http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post932079#post-932079

I take your "These idents make BBC Two weird...just sayin'" and raise you with the spontaneous outbursts of "I'm glad I don't have Freeview HD!" and "The BBC Breakfast studio is quite big!"

Go on, give me a kudo!

Somehow my thread on the new BBC Four idents has already been derailed.

Has anyone else noticed that some of the newer members often kudos posts that are back handed insults at them.

No offence but what does 620358 mean here?:

623058 wrote:Im getting fed up, there love cock on dave.

http://www.tvforum.co.uk/tvhome/dave-ge ... 051/page-3

I think it means they've been over-showing a certain ident, the cockerel alarm clock one, perchance?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_OC6c1Ndvo

At least, I HOPE that's what he means.

"bbcnewsfixboy" - OH GOD, THEY'RE BREEDING

Critique wrote:the Disney channel logo (now the Disney logo with the word channel underneath, looks like the Mickey mouse ears have gone

Declan wrote:Had a look there and you're they've given it a change and ditched the mickey mouse ears for the disney logo with "channel" underneath.

Thanks for regurgitating part of my post Declan!!!!

Will cityprod ever not be 'right' about anything when debating?

This is getting pathetic now.

You can't even note a newsreader is wearing glasses when they don't normally!

(Even though it's supposedly in the wrong thread!)

Don't you understand how something like that is neither important, nor interesting?