Metropol

WillPS wrote:Gavin, I have no issue with anybody on here whatsoever - what I take issue with is the way Pete and to a lesser extent yourself seem to single out sig-carrying ChatPS members and accuse them of making 'cliquey' remarks or (worse still) carrying some kind of policy to subvert discussion.

projection, paranoia, bitterness

I think if you try to demonstrate some examples if these comments, you will struggle.

I made a comment yesterday to Bilky which was totally misinterpreted - the opposite way in fact. I said, "and now you throw in some cliquey remark" which was intended to suggest that the metropol regulars were all in cahoots.

It was the least of my difficulties in communicating, to be honest, so I let it slide.

But I'd defy you to find a clutch of any comments you accuse me of. It's why I suggest your paranoia has overtaken your ability to see clearly.

Gavin Scott wrote:

WillPS wrote:Gavin, I have no issue with anybody on here whatsoever - what I take issue with is the way Pete and to a lesser extent yourself seem to single out sig-carrying ChatPS members and accuse them of making 'cliquey' remarks or (worse still) carrying some kind of policy to subvert discussion.

projection, paranoia, bitterness

I think if you try to demonstrate some examples if these comments, you will struggle.

I made a comment yesterday to Bilky which was totally misinterpreted - the opposite way in fact. I said, "and now you throw in some cliquey remark" which was intended to suggest that the metropol regulars were all in cahoots.

It was the least of my difficulties in communicating, to be honest, so I let it slide.

But I'd defy you to find a clutch of any comments you accuse me of. It's why I suggest your paranoia has overtaken your ability to see clearly.

I see, I retract my comments about yourself, with apologies.

I only mentioned cliques because bilky mentioned it first.

I think what we should all take from this is the discovery that his username is bilky and not billy as I'd thought for the best part of 7 years or however long it's been.

Just a point of clarification:

Pete wrote:I only mentioned cliques because bilky mentioned it first.

I think what we should all take from this is the discovery that his username is bilky and not billy as I'd thought for the best part of 7 years or however long it's been.

I only mentioned cliques because you mentioned it first.

Pete: 5 February 2013 2:13pm wrote:I thought we were trying to avoid the generic threads?

Although given that it appears the ChatPS "clique" secret manifesto is essentially to subvert the forum into an even bigger car crash for their own amusement this makes perfect sense.

URGH. Must you continue this after a 2 day silence, Bilky?

Sput wrote:URGH. Must you continue this after a 2 day silence, Bilky?

Yes. The forum was looking a bit sad without any activity.

Some of us have better things to do. Like annoying JAS84.

bilky asko wrote:

Sput wrote:URGH. Must you continue this after a 2 day silence, Bilky?

Yes. The forum was looking a bit sad without any activity.

BORING

Pete wrote:

bilky asko wrote:

Sput wrote:URGH. Must you continue this after a 2 day silence, Bilky?

Yes. The forum was looking a bit sad without any activity.

BORING

Yes, boring could also be applied to the situation too. It was boring to visit here and find no new posts.

Are you aware you're coming across as horribly smug, Bilky?

There's only room for one horrible smug bastard on this forum.

</wave>
#hashtagfail