Re: Myths, mistruths and a well oiled publicity machine
Posted: Sun 05 Oct, 2008 16.38
Thanks, everyone, for your contributions so far, and especially to those who don't post very often for sharing your personal views about this site.
When Martin offered me the opportunity to look after Metropol I accepted gladly; motivated by my desire to ensure the site continued. The original Lounge on TV Forum had quickly become one of my favourite parts of the site - a place I could be guaranteed to find something worth reading every day, or any time I clicked online.
As well as offering a broad palette of curious and amusing thread topics, the original Lounge saw a lot of quarrelling and bitchiness too - often arguments, or personality clashes from other topics would spill over into it. This was largely the reason it was separated from TV Forum onto a different site.
Metropol's Lounge is, for all intents and purposes, exactly the same as the original one; the only notable addition being the "TV Forum Watch" thread - which was created by merging many smaller, organically derived threads from various members who wanted to get something off their chest. Yes, it does contain a fair bit of whining - but at least its contained in one place. People like to whine - its human nature. For the most part, the topics and discussions are rich in their diversity and the opinions expressed in them.
Metropol has gone though a technical and design overhaul since Pete came on board, which has afforded him the opportunity to interrogate the analytical data about visitors to the site. This revealed an alarmingly high bounce rate to new visitors, and that's not a good thing. Whilst there is no current policy to seek to increase the membership, I would like to think that any visitor could drop by and click through to a discussion. Maybe they'll feel compelled to sign up and join in - or maybe they will read an answer to a burning question or mildly divert themselves for a moment. That would be a good thing.
We can continue to analyse the data to see if the new homepage helps with new visitors exploring the site. Perceptions about the site are more difficult to redesign, however - but not impossible.
I would just ask members to be mindful of the views expressed by some in this thread when greeting new members for the first time. Once they know they're welcome to join in, they will soon pick up on the varied wit and style you all demonstrate.
Further comments on these matters is welcomed. If you have something to share, please do.
When Martin offered me the opportunity to look after Metropol I accepted gladly; motivated by my desire to ensure the site continued. The original Lounge on TV Forum had quickly become one of my favourite parts of the site - a place I could be guaranteed to find something worth reading every day, or any time I clicked online.
As well as offering a broad palette of curious and amusing thread topics, the original Lounge saw a lot of quarrelling and bitchiness too - often arguments, or personality clashes from other topics would spill over into it. This was largely the reason it was separated from TV Forum onto a different site.
Metropol's Lounge is, for all intents and purposes, exactly the same as the original one; the only notable addition being the "TV Forum Watch" thread - which was created by merging many smaller, organically derived threads from various members who wanted to get something off their chest. Yes, it does contain a fair bit of whining - but at least its contained in one place. People like to whine - its human nature. For the most part, the topics and discussions are rich in their diversity and the opinions expressed in them.
Metropol has gone though a technical and design overhaul since Pete came on board, which has afforded him the opportunity to interrogate the analytical data about visitors to the site. This revealed an alarmingly high bounce rate to new visitors, and that's not a good thing. Whilst there is no current policy to seek to increase the membership, I would like to think that any visitor could drop by and click through to a discussion. Maybe they'll feel compelled to sign up and join in - or maybe they will read an answer to a burning question or mildly divert themselves for a moment. That would be a good thing.
We can continue to analyse the data to see if the new homepage helps with new visitors exploring the site. Perceptions about the site are more difficult to redesign, however - but not impossible.
I would just ask members to be mindful of the views expressed by some in this thread when greeting new members for the first time. Once they know they're welcome to join in, they will soon pick up on the varied wit and style you all demonstrate.
Further comments on these matters is welcomed. If you have something to share, please do.