Metropol

Dusty Jacket wrote:

James H wrote:

Dusty Jacket wrote: That comment reveals to us all why YOU are not in a relationship.

To be honest, who gives a fuck whether or not anyone's in a relationship? And who are you to tell James how to run his life?

Oh go have a bath you sexually repressed gravy licker.

To be honest, I prefer J.Christie to you at the moment, and that took a lot for me to say.

Do you fancy James? Or are you just trying valiantly to turn everyone on the forum against him like a silly little bully?

James H wrote: Do you fancy James? Or are you just trying valiantly to turn everyone on the forum against him like a silly little bully?

James, get your Munch Bunch books out and let Daddy read to you for a while.

Jamez Trout has bullied a lot of people, he has made numerious comments about the sexuality of individuals in the media and his most favourite slur is the word 'virgin', which he uses against forumers when he has run out of his usual material.

You're just scared of speaking out, because if you do he will call you a fat virgin.

Dusty Jacket wrote:

James H wrote: Do you fancy James? Or are you just trying valiantly to turn everyone on the forum against him like a silly little bully?

James, get your Munch Bunch books out and let Daddy read to you for a while.

Jamez Trout has bullied a lot of people, he has made numerious comments about the sexuality of individuals in the media and his most favourite slur is the word 'virgin', which he uses against forumers when he has run out of his usual material.

You're just scared of speaking out, because if you do he will call you a fat virgin.

So WHY sink down to his level, if you think it's so low?

James H wrote:So WHY sink down to his level, if you think it's so low?

I agree with you. That is why I have risen above it.

Dusty Jacket wrote:

James H wrote:So WHY sink down to his level, if you think it's so low?

I agree with you. That is why I have risen above it.

Yet you reply to all the threads you can just to have a go at him?

James H wrote:Yet you reply to all the threads you can just to have a go at him?

All my replies are useful contributions to the forum. I have given Metropol an edge. You should be greatful, you shouldn't try to push me from this fora with your hurtful comments.

Dusty Jacket wrote:

johnnyboy wrote:

Dusty Jacket wrote:I ask this because on your website you describe yourself as 'laid back, approachable, friendly,confident,independant and loyal.' [sic] and I don't believe your behavour or 'flirting' is 'loyal'.

You've never been in a long relationship, have you, DJ?

That comment reveals to us all why YOU are not in a relationship.

Is yours locked in the cellar just in case she looks at another bloke?

Dusty Jacket wrote:All my replies are useful contributions to the forum. I have given Metropol an edge. You should be greatful, you shouldn't try to push me from this fora with your hurtful comments.

Some of your stuff is quite funny, I'll be the first to admit.

I still don't see why you couldn't stand up and say this under your real username though.

You wouldn't have got banned for it.

The only thing I'd ban you for (if I had the powers) is if you correctly identified the real name of your target(s) in your posts. That sort of stuff can affect a lot of things, especially as Googling is now quite common. Keep on that side of the line and you should be fine.

Back on topic - I bought a digital camera today. A Fujifilm A 345.

It's my first ever digital camera, and although I like the instantaneousness (if there is ever such a word) of digital photography, the quality, at least on my camera close up is a bit naff (the JPEG compression is visible when you zoom in) and the delay from the time you press the shutter release button to the time the photo appears on screen causes problems as sometimes you don't get the shot you want, but one a few seconds later.

Due to this I'm tempted to take it back and swap it for another one or get a refund and stick to my trusty film camera.

Anyway, here's some pictures I took of my local monument to commercialism (aka Kingston town centre) after I bought it and had a cursory glance through the manual: -















What do you think? Keep the camera, or take it back?

The delay is something you get used to after a while. It annoyed me a lot at first but, for me at least, the benefits of digital photography far outweigh the fact it takes a second for the picture to actually take!

Like anything, the more money you spend, the better the quality. If you splash out with more money you will get a camera that doesn't have the delay. It is relatively difficult to find a camera at a "reasonable" price range that doesn't have some kind of niggling minus point. The reality is there is no top end to the price range of digital cameras, and you pay for what you get.

Anyway. Here's a picture I'm rather proud of. Taken in London. Obviously.

Chris wrote:Back on topic - I bought a digital camera today. A Fujifilm A 345.

It's my first ever digital camera, and although I like the instantaneousness (if there is ever such a word) of digital photography, the quality, at least on my camera close up is a bit naff (the JPEG compression is visible when you zoom in) and the delay from the time you press the shutter release button to the time the photo appears on screen causes problems as sometimes you don't get the shot you want, but one a few seconds later.

Due to this I'm tempted to take it back and swap it for another one or get a refund and stick to my trusty film camera.

Anyway, here's some pictures I took of my local monument to commercialism (aka Kingston town centre) after I bought it and had a cursory glance through the manual: -

*snip*

What do you think? Keep the camera, or take it back?

Fuckkkkk! I live near there......
You know where I live!