Metropol

tvmocker14 wrote:

Alexia wrote:TVmocker is going to be this summer's "fondly remembered member".

thanks

Irony. Look it up. If you've done an English Lit GCSE inmongst your large collection of qualifications bought off eBay, you should know what it means.

If someone could work out what Plymouth is on about in the Breakfast thread I'd be grateful.

It's his "whatever certain members say, disagree with / criticise" method of working. Sad really. Almost a mental illness.

ill get back to it soon JK08. It's just I have other work to do for an advertisement thats local at the minute.

tvmocker14 thinks he's Martin Lambie-Nairn.

You know, I thought exactly that!

Pete wrote:If someone could work out what Plymouth is on about in the Breakfast thread I'd be grateful.

Did you see the timestamp? 2.34am. He would have been pickled on a box of Liebfraumilch, probably.

Stuart wrote:

Gavin Scott wrote:Naga comes across well too - and yes, it's a pity Sian is leaving the sofa.

All in all they've got a great selection of talent. And I do like Charlie - I just wish he seemed to enjoy the programme as much as the others.

Previously you seem to have a vendetta against some of the BBC Breakfast presenters, particularly evidenced by this:

Gavin Scott wrote:I see Charlie has inadvertently reinstalled his anti-chemistry chip.
There's Susanna bantering away.... in a vacuum.

It's a pointless and useless slur against the programme, and its presenters, as you obviously watch it through choice against many other offerings on t'TellyBox.

Fair enough if he wants to wade in and accuse me of contradicting myself - that's his prerogative. I wasn't, as it happens - I *do* like Charlie Stayt - but lately he's been lacking in banter.

Stu probably didn't notice that all three of my posts on the subject were from Friday - morning, lunchtime and evening. He's quoting me from the same conversation.

He announces that I, "seem to have a vendetta against some of the BBC Breakfast presenters", before going on to quote the point I made in its entirety. By preceding this with "particularly evidenced by...", he leaves the reader to infer that this is one of many criticisms and complaints I have made.

Its not. "I see Charlie has inadvertently reinstalled his anti-chemistry chip." That was my point in its entirety.

How he gets to "vendettas" and "pointless slurs" and that gobbledegook about "watching through choice", I really don't know.

I hope it is just the booze talking, because he's sounding a bit like a mental.

He's the one with the melty face, right? Naw, he's a mental.

When I try to read threads over on TVF, as soon as the latest page of a thread loads, my browser jumps to another website - for some reason, the homepage of YouTube.

Is anyone else experiencing this at the moment?

Can i ask why we're still feeding TV Mocker?

Jason wrote:Can i ask why we're still feeding TV Mocker?

Because we pledge £2 a month to the NSPCM.

Beep wrote:

Jason wrote:Can i ask why we're still feeding TV Mocker?

Because we pledge £2 a month to the NSPCM.

Our friend will write (presumably not to GCSE standard) and an adorable cuddly Mocker.