I was aware two seperate sites, diff systems etc etc...Nick Harvey wrote:I take it that Pako assumes that the report queue over there can be seen by the moderators over here and hasn't twigged that the sites are separate.
Maybe you should sit back down....Critique wrote:And also that the moderators over here do a weekly round-up of who has been reported, and then publicise it.
Really there is a time when something is taken too far, and your posting for the sake of it!!!! I am sitting down? But either way, it was simply a remark on my half, a comment. Not the need, and pardon the expression, for you to get your knickers in a twist.I was aware two seperate sites, diff systems etc etc...Nick Harvey wrote:
I take it that Pako assumes that the report queue over there can be seen by the moderators over here and hasn't twigged that the sites are separate.
Maybe you should sit back down....Critique wrote:
And also that the moderators over here do a weekly round-up of who has been reported, and then publicise it.
It's "bait", darling.pakokelso93 wrote:The bate is working well on my fishing road... 'bite' 'bite' 'bite'
Now who's the idiot posting for the sake of it?pakokelso93 wrote:The bate is working well on my fishing rod... 'bite' 'bite' 'bite'
Not all 'God's gift' eh!Nick Harvey wrote:Now who's the idiot posting for the sake of it?pakokelso93 wrote:The bate is working well on my fishing rod... 'bite' 'bite' 'bite'
I strongly suggest you inspect your own motives before further criticising those of others.
