Metropol

Not sure who you are, but I QUITE want to melt your eyes.

dosxuk wrote:

Lightoftruth wrote:

Pete wrote:
Why are you winking? Is that a reference to our policy? That is purely to stop spambots and only affects the very first post.

I thought you have emotions for a reason. Anywhere I'm off to congrats this place for being here 7 years

Like the "Add Reply" and "New Topic" buttons, they're available for when they're needed, and not there to use just because you've worked out how your mouse works.

They never seem to get used anywhere

Lightoftruth wrote:They never seem to get used anywhere

Quite. Perhaps you should use your keyboard less.

I've decided to stop posting on TV Forum until ginofish and lightoftruth are booted off the forum. I've never seen the forum sink so low in the 9 years I've been frequenting it, and I've never resorted to these measures before, but I'm just very pissed off with the state of some of the threads.

Right. I can't post it over there as I have banned myself but this guy's a clueless grade A cunt who makes Mugabe look popular and Kim Kardashian look intelligent

http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/topic31351

James Martin was entertaining, and annoying. This twat's just annoying, therefore shouldn't there be some sort of campaign to get him and the one in the bushes outside Kaplinsky's house out of the internet till the end of recorded time?

I see no one likes me here too

Which one are you? Curtain twitcher or ginofuck?

James H wrote:the one in the bushes outside Kaplinsky's house

I doubt he's in the bushes - he know's to much about Kaplinsky's pregnancies. Probably got portable TV hidden behind the bins so he can froth at her lack of presenting talent while searching for any test results.

Also, are my attempts at humour getting more pathetic, or is itvnewsfan just oblivious to my piss taking?

dosxuk wrote:

itvnewsfan wrote:Thank You for giving this info for the ones that lack behind.

And I'm not too sure what the proportions of your bottom have to do with anything regardless of how lacking in our behinds we are...

His response:

itvnewsfan wrote:The proportion of the amount of pixels will always be the same. I could have opted for the new 960 by 640 px. It would still fit.

Erm... ok.

Oh, and TVIdents, no, nobody likes you here either. Yet.

You have to prove your worth to the community before you're accepted, not just post rubbish and expect us to love you. I would recommend the BBC Points of View boards if you're after that sort of action - just start your first post with a complaint about the licence fee, over-zealous moderation, how left wing the BBC management is, how right wing the BBC management is, or any popular consipiracy theory.

In ginofish's eyes Adrian Chiles and Christine Whatsherface are such household and universally known names he has decided that he can call them AC and CB without a double take as we question his inane sanity.

I notice that everyone's favourite liar has decreed safe areas redundant.
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post674915#post674915

So there you have it

Pete wrote:I notice that everyone's favourite liar has decreed safe areas redundant.
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post674915#post674915

So there you have it

*snigger*