Could you give an example?eoin wrote:Why is it that any posts that are actually about pres are met with disinterest on TVF nowadays?
TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
-
Gavin Scott
- Admin
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
The only example I can give is quite self-absorbed, a post I made a few days ago in the Sky News thread about why the new look is crap. Can't find it now as the search feature is useless. Admittedly there was a lot going on at the time, what with Burley and Boulton and the new side panels.Gavin Scott wrote:Could you give an example?eoin wrote:Why is it that any posts that are actually about pres are met with disinterest on TVF nowadays?
In general though I just get the sense that there are a lot of posters now who aren't remotely interested in pres and they're turning in to the majority. However it's quite possible that I'm just annoyed at my own posts being ignored.
there are quite a lot of posters who are only interested in rotas and it is often the case that any interesting developments are lost in amongst the noise.
The splitting of the BBC rota thread has in part helped for the news 24 thread, but there is still an awful lot of noise elsewhere.
The splitting of the BBC rota thread has in part helped for the news 24 thread, but there is still an awful lot of noise elsewhere.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
-
Gavin Scott
- Admin
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Oh I get a bit like that too. Especially when I'd like a slew of readers to go "*zing*" at my comments.eoin wrote: However it's quite possible that I'm just annoyed at my own posts being ignored.
Pete's right about the stalkers though. Especially the ones who sit noting presenter shifts and then tell us how sorry they feel for the presenters.
In the school that stevek2 works at, does he have any sort of responsibility for the education of pupils?
Another annoying habit, especially in the Sky News thread, is the complete ignoring of any critical opinion towards their own point of view. e.g. before the election when we asked why Grayling wasn't questioned on the B&B issue and they just steamrollered past out detailed replies. It's rude.Gavin Scott wrote:Oh I get a bit like that too. Especially when I'd like a slew of readers to go "*zing*" at my comments.eoin wrote: However it's quite possible that I'm just annoyed at my own posts being ignored.
Pete's right about the stalkers though. Especially the ones who sit noting presenter shifts and then tell us how sorry they feel for the presenters.
Frankly, I'd dispose of the lot of them. Or at least get them to learn how to use a forum properly, I mean look at this place, we engage Chie in debate even when he comes out with some of his nuttiest posts, we don't simply ignore him.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
-
aeonsource
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Tue 03 Jun, 2008 15.02
What not 'Haters gonna hate'?dosxuk wrote:There does seem to be a catch-all response to any criticism levelled at Sky News - "Sky News iz da bestest" - regardless of what the criticism is about or any validity the poster may have.
:V
Have I gone mad, or have some members forgotten that ITN/ITV News music is library...
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post663907
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post663907
I'd say some moderators have.rob wrote:Have I gone mad, or have some members forgotten that ITN/ITV News music is library...
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post663907
Yes, you tried to draw attention to it in the thread too. Why exactly do you care, what harm is it doing you personally by being there?rob wrote:Have I gone mad, or have some members forgotten that ITN/ITV News music is library...
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post663907
Didn't you technically post a font a while back which was against the minutae of the rules?