Re: Michael Jackson dead at 50
Posted: Fri 26 Jun, 2009 15.14
Hrm, I'm no doctor, but getting a daily injection of potent painkillers doesn't quite square with him putting on 50 performances starting in a month or so.
Anyone care to bet on how long it is before the Digital Spy rules of dictatorship are amended to forbid any negative comment on Jackson, with Beth Hart brought back to moderate it?Hymagumba wrote:they really have reached new levels of shit over there
Link"I warned everyone that I could, I said to family members that one day, that Michael Jackson was going to wake up dead,"
That is a bit over the top. The same thing happened here after September the 11th and I thought that was a bid odd at the time as well, even though the event was so big.cwathen wrote:I am somewhat amazed at how the general media seemed to have dropped everything to cover this as if the queen had died - even the Plymouth Evening Herald - the fricking local rag which is supposed to be about Plymouth - is today running with 'Michael Jackson Dead at 50' with no explanation as to why they have put a world news story on their front page.
First word of those three says it all!cwathen wrote:Plymouth Evening Herald
cwathen wrote:I am somewhat amazed at how the general media seemed to have dropped everything to cover this as if the queen had died - even the Plymouth Evening Herald - the fricking local rag which is supposed to be about Plymouth - is today running with 'Michael Jackson Dead at 50' with no explanation as to why they have put a world news story on their front page.
So not for the first time, something called Plymouth has a overinflated sense of self importance?That is a bit over the top. The same thing happened here after September the 11th and I thought that was a bid odd at the time as well, even though the event was so big.
You're the redeeming feature.fusionlad wrote:Oi watch the Plymouth jibes. We're not all like The Herald and Stuart
Also, places like Plymouth wouldn't have got a late edition of the national papers, so there would be little-to-no coverage in the nationals. Even in South Wales we only got the Sun, Mail and Times covering the story. So buying the Western Mail was a viable alternative.cwathen wrote: I am somewhat amazed at how the general media seemed to have dropped everything to cover this as if the queen had died - even the Plymouth Evening Herald - the fricking local rag which is supposed to be about Plymouth - is today running with 'Michael Jackson Dead at 50' with no explanation as to why they have put a world news story on their front page.
Poor in the sense of disturbed and clearly unwell.Gavin Scott wrote:
A "poor man" he wasn't.
No, but it does leave one unsure, and since people don't know for sure, they've no right to say "He did it. He wasn't found guilty but I know he did it."Just to be absolutely clear - being found "not guilty" is not the same as being found innocent.
I can see why that is suspicious, but perhaps the fact that the general opinion put forward by the media was that Jackson was a weirdo and that his odd behaviour correlated quite closely with the accusations put against him would prompt him to see that he could be fighting a losing battle. Maybe there was something that could have been misinterpreted.But worse still is paying millions of dollars to make a court case just "go away".
Agreed.Gavin Scott wrote:You're the redeeming feature.