Page 5 of 6
Posted: Fri 21 Oct, 2005 02.05
by stu
James Hatts wrote:I'm always suspicious of people who write 'Bbc' or 'Itv' in thread titles.
You get a lot of that sort of riff-raff over at Digital Spy.
Any forum that isn't a pres forum will write Itv or Bbc
Usually followed by "I only watch Itv for football, the rest is rubbish" or how much they like their US imports
Posted: Sat 22 Oct, 2005 18.37
by Andrew
stu wrote:James Hatts wrote:I'm always suspicious of people who write 'Bbc' or 'Itv' in thread titles.
You get a lot of that sort of riff-raff over at Digital Spy.
Any forum that isn't a pres forum will write Itv or Bbc
Usually followed by "I only watch Itv for football, the rest is rubbish" or how much they like their US imports
Most non-pres forums, seem to go with the 'channel 1, channel 3',etc and of course 'sky' for anything non-terrestrial
Posted: Tue 25 Oct, 2005 15.25
by Anonymous
Jamez wrote:Oh god!
Itsrobot seems to be having a cybersex relationship with BBC News presenters, now.
Can this boy get any geekier?
I'm not sure - he could always have a "cybersex relationship" with a dried up old hag with a crap haircut who's on her 4th husband. Now that would be "geeky", wouldn't it?
Posted: Fri 28 Oct, 2005 16.19
by noelfirl
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopi ... 32&start=0
Is anybody else slightly concerned that this ridiculous self appointed "mock council of the nobodies" is being allowed to continue unabated and approved by the mods (in the form of thread stickyness) when it is blatently obvious that it completely unnecessary and incredibly patronising to have such a system in place.
All the mock forum needs to improve is to have some good mocks and effective written opinions, without unnecessary ratings, stars, or cliched "criteria" points to write in context of.
Posted: Fri 28 Oct, 2005 17.02
by Chris
noelfirl wrote:http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopi ... 32&start=0
Is anybody else slightly concerned that this ridiculous self appointed "mock council of the nobodies" is being allowed to continue unabated and approved by the mods (in the form of thread stickyness) when it is blatently obvious that it completely unnecessary and incredibly patronising to have such a system in place.
All the mock forum needs to improve is to have some good mocks and effective written opinions, without unnecessary ratings, stars, or cliched "criteria" points to write in context of.
I think all this formulaic crap is a bit too, well, school like. Plus, with the star bits as well. If I want to make comments, then I will be honest, and stick to no guidelines.
I wll say what comes to mind based on what I see in front of me - if it's shit then I will say so without the aid of stars.
Posted: Fri 28 Oct, 2005 19.14
by Nick Harvey
Isn't the whole damn place far too "school-like" ever since Mental Charlie took over?
It's not just the mock area, it's the rest of the sections as well.
Posted: Fri 28 Oct, 2005 19.28
by wells
[quote="Nick Harvey"]Isn't the whole damn place far too "school-like" ever since Mental Charlie took over?
I belive that Chalie is the best MOD on TVF.
Posted: Fri 28 Oct, 2005 20.16
by Pete
yes but you have an ugly face
Posted: Fri 28 Oct, 2005 20.17
by James H
Hymagumba wrote:yes but you have an ugly face
he reminds me of will young.
I hate will young.
Posted: Fri 28 Oct, 2005 20.20
by wells
Hymagumba wrote:yes but you have an ugly face
Indeed in that photo but thats why I choosed it!
Posted: Fri 28 Oct, 2005 20.22
by wells
James H wrote:Hymagumba wrote:yes but you have an ugly face
he reminds me of will young.
I hate will young.
How does Hymagumba look like Will Young? He looks like he should be in McFly!