Metropol

Beep wrote:

Critique wrote:That Iceland advert is actually going to be the death of me. It is the most irritating ad ever, and they show it about six times every ad break, two full versions and then another four or so stings. The whole image it creates is preposterous, and the whole thing is stupid.

Tell me about it! One one of them I saw a proper granny fanny (the one where they do the Can-Can).

I love this advert and never get bored of it. I think its a lot of fun and very well done.

nidave wrote:

Beep wrote:

Critique wrote:That Iceland advert is actually going to be the death of me. It is the most irritating ad ever, and they show it about six times every ad break, two full versions and then another four or so stings. The whole image it creates is preposterous, and the whole thing is stupid.

Tell me about it! One one of them I saw a proper granny fanny (the one where they do the Can-Can).

I love this advert and never get bored of it. I think its a lot of fun and very well done.

To think that could have been me in that ad.

Starbucks has revealed it's new logo to coincide with its 40th anniversary in March.
I like it; I know they've brought back the original brown logo for some of their concept stores, bit I do prefer this new version. Shows how iconic Starbucks has become really.

They've released another photo, plus some more info here.
Ah, I think it's nice. Simple. It looks classier and less American, which is perhaps a good thing as they expand across the globe. Apparently it's also to distance themselves from the idea that Starbucks is just coffee.

Best comment I've seen so far? "At this rate, by the year 2084, it'll just be an extreme close-up of her nostrils."

If someone could explain to me the logic of them getting rid of mugs I'd be grateful.

Too many people pinching them?

....or maybe it's just me.

While I don't mind the aesthetics of it, and I appreciate the logic for ditching 'Coffee' from the name, I wonder if they've under-appreciated how important the bold typography was to making Starbucks instantly recognisable. I suspect if you asked a lot of people to doodle the Starbucks logo sight unseen (ie. not geeks like us), the siren itself might be lost in the overall shape, colour, and type. Or, at the very least, I can imagine that outside the States it's less iconic, which is a bit odd if this is meant to make it easier to take over the world.
All speculation on my part of course...

cdd wrote:Too many people pinching them?

....or maybe it's just me.

him who used to work there says they ignored all but absurd levels of mug theft as it acted as advertising.

I would imagine the bold typeface will feature on store signage, menus and other promotional media, however for cups and other uses, the symbol will exist on its own, and I think its a strong enough image to carry its own.

They're getting rid of mugs?!

WillPS wrote:They're getting rid of mugs?!

They'd better not. Mugs that pay £2.95 for a cup of coffee is all that keeps them in business.