Page 353 of 844
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 10.58
by Charlie Wells
AJ wrote:tvmagman wrote:i think i may email her as i know what it is like to loss someone that young as i lost my brother
Well that's a horrific facepalm moment.
According to the public profile he now has a blog
http://stuartukblog.blogspot.com/
Is anyone else still experiencing problems in viewing the 'latest post' information for Metropol on the TVForum home page?
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 11.43
by Pete
yup, it seems to vanish occasionally. asa mentioned in the snivvelfest thread that it's due to metro being tardy in responding, hence my thread the other day asking how others were finding the speed.
It seems a few people were having the same issue where it takes a moment to get reply from the server but once you do it flies down. Oddly the ping for the server is only 176ms which is hardly massive so perhaps its something to do with the software or the database server. Will keep investigating, there is a bottleneck somewhere, I'll find it.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 11.50
by lukey
Maybe YOU'RE the bottleneck.
HEADS SHOULD ROLL.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 13.02
by Pete
maybe the bottleneck is at the point where YOU have code in the system. Actually I might have an idea where it is, but I shart reveal it publically.
Back to the other site, i notice the ghastly tvmagman has been banned? Any fabulous reasons or was it just because he even out-cretined the usual new members?
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 13.20
by Sput
If you want to work out how long the script is taking to execute the simplest way is to call the php now() function at the start and end and see what the difference is, then record it somewhere out of the way. That's your run time right there.
You can even record a series and see if they spike.
ooo and then you could run a fourier analysis on them to see if there's a periodicity.
OOOOO and then you could see if there's a correlation between periodicity and tvf traffic.
TO THE LABORATORY
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 14.01
by lukey
Hymagumba wrote:maybe the bottleneck is at the point where YOU have code in the system. Actually I might have an idea where it is, but I shart reveal it publically.
PFFT, maybe if you'd *let* me do Meanwhile 2.0, you wouldn't HAVE this problem.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 16.10
by nidave
lukey wrote:Hymagumba wrote:maybe the bottleneck is at the point where YOU have code in the system. Actually I might have an idea where it is, but I shart reveal it publically.
PFFT, maybe if you'd *let* me do Meanwhile 2.0, you wouldn't HAVE this problem.
Meh, 2.0 is so overrated. We need to go full circle and use HTML 1.0 or better still get sput to write everything down and then send it via Royal Mail and we can reply.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 16.16
by Sput
Let's go one better: pigeons.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 17.01
by nidave
Sput wrote:Let's go one better: pigeons.
ohhh are we allowed to kill them and cook them afterwards?
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 17.15
by AJ
Charlie Wells wrote:AJ wrote:tvmagman wrote:i think i may email her as i know what it is like to loss someone that young as i lost my brother
Well that's a horrific facepalm moment.
According to the public profile he now has a blog
http://stuartukblog.blogspot.com/
Is anyone else still experiencing problems in viewing the 'latest post' information for Metropol on the TVForum home page?
Haha! I actually clicked that link and read it. It's mostly garbled spew but I did manage to decipher that he's blaming RBS for not having a proper website. If it is RBS' fault, then I think we should thank them.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 04 Apr, 2009 17.44
by nidave
AJ wrote:
Haha! I actually clicked that link and read it. It's mostly garbled spew but I did manage to decipher that he's blaming RBS for not having a proper website. If it is RBS' fault, then I think we should thank them.
It took me 4 goes to get that - even after reading your post above. Has he never heard of geocities?