Page 350 of 844

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Sun 22 Mar, 2009 15.13
by Beep
Nini wrote:Shut up beep, you need to be banned too.
You need to control that attitude problem.

The RSPCA don't give dogs like you a second chance.

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Sun 22 Mar, 2009 15.16
by Nini
Fair comeback, bit StuPly in referring to me as a dog (go fuck yourself) but it's decent.

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Mon 23 Mar, 2009 11.31
by rob
lester wrote:tvmagman clearly needs to be banned for being a tit.
Agreed. I'm getting sick to the back of him posting banal questions and comments.

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Mon 23 Mar, 2009 13.11
by Gavin Scott
Call me a suspicious alowicious, but tvmagman and @ blegirl both signed up at the same time - but so did one other - keefybaby.

Keef white, anyone?

Its just possible that tvmagman and @blegirl were both some kind of cover to distract from Keefy (longtimereaderfirsttimeposter)baby's signup.

Clever move to start the most on-topic thread you could, i.e. one which discussed old favourite CAs.

I'm afraid I've seen it all before.

Watch out for keefybaby - that's my tip.

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Tue 24 Mar, 2009 20.51
by Jake
How long has this been here? Days, Weeks, Months? http://tvfi.co.uk/offair.html

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2009 16.32
by Col
Has anyone else noticed the old Hollyoaks thread has been rescued from the archive?

And did anyone notice which member requested for it to be brought back?

Like American Express adverts used to say, membership has its privileges.

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2009 17.30
by Gavin Scott
Col wrote:Has anyone else noticed the old Hollyoaks thread has been rescued from the archive?

And did anyone notice which member requested for it to be brought back?
I had not.

Nor had I noticed that member replying to himself successively on the last but one page, as if he somehow prefers it like that.

As I am above such pettiness.

Oh yes.

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2009 21.18
by Stuart*
Gavin Scott wrote:
Col wrote:Has anyone else noticed the old Hollyoaks thread has been rescued from the archive?

And did anyone notice which member requested for it to be brought back?
I had not.

Nor had I noticed that member replying to himself successively on the last but one page, as if he somehow prefers it like that.

As I am above such pettiness.

Oh yes.
I restarted a 'Hollyoaks' thread because the last one was archived, and I put exactly the same title/sub-title on it as 'Brekkie' had done, but he wanted to ressurrect the one that had died 3 months earlier because it had his name on it. I doubt anyone was bothered enough to object.

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Wed 25 Mar, 2009 22.25
by Alexia
Interesting that Asa still hasn't acknowledged the existence of the TX Suite yet, as it isn't in the TVF list-of-forums dropdown menu whatjamacallit.

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Thu 26 Mar, 2009 00.01
by Chie
Ooohhh! Look! There's what appears to be a preview image on the home page...

Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Posted: Thu 26 Mar, 2009 09.05
by Pete
Alexia wrote:Interesting that Asa still hasn't acknowledged the existence of the TX Suite yet
deckchairs