You need to control that attitude problem.Nini wrote:Shut up beep, you need to be banned too.
The RSPCA don't give dogs like you a second chance.
Agreed. I'm getting sick to the back of him posting banal questions and comments.lester wrote:tvmagman clearly needs to be banned for being a tit.
I had not.Col wrote:Has anyone else noticed the old Hollyoaks thread has been rescued from the archive?
And did anyone notice which member requested for it to be brought back?
I restarted a 'Hollyoaks' thread because the last one was archived, and I put exactly the same title/sub-title on it as 'Brekkie' had done, but he wanted to ressurrect the one that had died 3 months earlier because it had his name on it. I doubt anyone was bothered enough to object.Gavin Scott wrote:I had not.Col wrote:Has anyone else noticed the old Hollyoaks thread has been rescued from the archive?
And did anyone notice which member requested for it to be brought back?
Nor had I noticed that member replying to himself successively on the last but one page, as if he somehow prefers it like that.
As I am above such pettiness.
Oh yes.