Page 32 of 844
Posted: Thu 11 Jan, 2007 18.00
by Gavin Scott
Ant wrote:miss hellfire wrote:Gavin Scott wrote:Aye man braw etc etc.
Lorna is an effervescent character to be sure, but I don't have the ned-energy to keep up in that thread.
Pardon! Am i missing something?
Different Lorna, Lorna.

Yes you two spell and pronounce your names differently.
I meant Laura.
Posted: Thu 11 Jan, 2007 21.33
by Lorns
Phew! For a minute i thought i was in terwubble.
Posted: Sat 13 Jan, 2007 01.30
by B.E. El-Zebub
Hello FORUMERS !
I have been surfing the inter-web and I have found a U.R.L. that I wish to share with you ?
http://www.cuteonly.ru/view.php?a_aid=ml&id=37665
I look forward to hearing your views . !
Best wishes ,
bartholomewebenezerhoratiobeelzebub1
Posted: Sat 13 Jan, 2007 18.29
by Lorns
Barty bub you do my head in. What is that all about then?
Posted: Sat 13 Jan, 2007 19.03
by Alarsne53
Bartholomew Beelzebub wrote:Hello FORUMERS !
I have been surfing the inter-web and I have found a U.R.L. that I wish to share with you ?
http://www.cuteonly.ru/view.php?a_aid=ml&id=37665
I look forward to hearing your views . !
Best wishes ,
bartholomewebenezerhoratiobeelzebub1
You sir deserve the michaelgrantchapman1 award for best amateur sleuth 2007.
That is all.
Posted: Sat 13 Jan, 2007 20.57
by Jovis
I love this post, from the BBC News 24 Thread. I expect the user 'Dunedin' is training to be a school teacher.
Dunedin wrote:Hymagumba wrote:which part of my sig does not make sense?
You're watching Look North, with Harry Gration and Tits Magee
623058 said: Maybe it you clooks!
My point is that short of a handful of regional types (yes you can spot their anoraks a mile off) the first line is meaningless- I haven't got a clue whether the reference to a "tits" magee is a reference to
a) large bosoms
b) libelous
c) a real name
The second line referring to "clooks" is not English (I know you didn't write it originally, but it's in your sig and it simply doesn't make sense).
Compared to:
British television when it catches up with American television:
"If you have been affected by any of the issues in this advert break, please contact the action line. Next on BBC One, the new Tweenies for adolescents, the Teenies. This programme contains strong language, violence, nudity, and racist views."
Which is a
poor attempt of humour, but, compared to your sig has some meaning. Namely:
a) A comment on how British culture invariably follows our American counterparts
b) A comment on the excess advertising on American TV (and the spread here)
c) A comment on American litigious culture attempting to cover their asses at every given opportunity.
d) A comment on the slow dumbing down of British TV.
You see in comparison to your sig, I read it and derived some meaning. It's still a poor sig, but yours is frankly awful.
Case closed.
Back to BBC News 24.
Posted: Sat 13 Jan, 2007 23.21
by noelfirl
Jesus H. fuck, somebody needs to stop Andrew Tyne Tees from having a signature, because the randomly changing images every half hour are making me wonder if I'm going mad.
Posted: Sat 13 Jan, 2007 23.24
by Alarsne53
At least while he is changing his sig every half hour, he is kept away from editing thread titles.
Posted: Mon 15 Jan, 2007 11.10
by Pete
May I applaud the tickler discussion members for the cleverest leak in ages
Posted: Mon 15 Jan, 2007 21.54
by Andrew
Oh my god, Andrew Tyne Tees is driving me insane tonight
He seems to reply to every thread just reconfirming or agreeing with the post above, but not adding anything new
Posted: Mon 15 Jan, 2007 22.36
by Alarsne53
He has done that ever since he joined up, he seems to feel the need to summarise as if he is leading a conversation with everyone.