Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sun 24 Feb, 2013 00.07
Should I get popcorn?
bilky asko wrote: It was a reference to you telling me to shut up and fuck off. I think it's akin to it, if not cyberbullying itself.
Gavin Scott wrote:Are you serious? A direct disagreement and a swear word and you'd cry bully against me in a public banner.
Show me where I did.bilky asko wrote:Don't try to ameliorate what you've said after the fact.
20:19Gavin Scott wrote:bilky asko wrote: It was a reference to you telling me to shut up and fuck off. I think it's akin to it, if not cyberbullying itself.Gavin Scott wrote:Are you serious? A direct disagreement and a swear word and you'd cry bully against me in a public banner.Show me where I did.bilky asko wrote:Don't try to ameliorate what you've said after the fact.
21:07Gavin Scott wrote:Oh do shut up.
Gavin Scott wrote:Fuck off.
23:56Gavin Scott wrote:Show me where I attempted to ameliorate telling you to shut up and fuck off.
Gavin Scott wrote:A direct disagreement [shut up] and a swear word [fuck off] and you'd cry bully against me in a public banner?
Data Protection Act?Gavin Scott wrote:Your definitions are fucked. Fuck is a swear word.
Cyberbullying is something very different from me telling you to shut up and fuck off.
Like what you were plotting in the metropol chat room about a member of this board and tv forum. There's more planning and scheming and general ill-will involved in Cyberbullying.
I think, for the benefit of everyone, it's about time to post the logs of what exactly what you were writing in there.
You'll doubtless be aware it's all a matter of record.
What about it?bilky asko wrote:Data Protection Act?Gavin Scott wrote:Your definitions are fucked. Fuck is a swear word.
Cyberbullying is something very different from me telling you to shut up and fuck off.
Like what you were plotting in the metropol chat room about a member of this board and tv forum. There's more planning and scheming and general ill-will involved in Cyberbullying.
I think, for the benefit of everyone, it's about time to post the logs of what exactly what you were writing in there.
You'll doubtless be aware it's all a matter of record.
There was a handful of people who used the Metrochat facility between May and November last year, correct.Gavin Scott wrote:Well you used Metropols chat facility for a long time - Jon and David did certainly. It was turned off because it had an impact on the main site - the speed, bandwidth, whatever. We expected you to find another one, and you did one better and opened your own.WillPS wrote: I mean that it seems fairly obvious to me that there is some [deep-]rooted resentment against those involved with ChatPS by the higher-ups on here.
Where would the logic be in having resentment about that?
I wasn't overly keen in the signatures you adopted because those spoof topic titles did appear on the face of it to be taking the piss out of the eclectic discussions held here.
Or am I mistaken about them?
In any event, if you have a chip on your shoulder about what the "higher ups" think about ChatPS, I can tell you I really didn't give it much thought.
I would hazard a guess that those behind Metropol don't really give a shit.WillPS wrote:I think the continued presence (growth even), of a TV Forum subculture beside Metropol has annoyed those behind Metropol. Tell me I'm wrong if you like.