Metropol

Jeez, would you two just have sex and have done with it?

Hah - the irony. Just looking at Sput's remarks saying its just beginning and all and I look at the title of the post: "THAT storm is coming. Seems to me it isn't a meteorlogical storm we need to be worrying about - more of an argumentative storm between two discerning members of Metropol!

Connor Sephton wrote:Hah - the irony. Just looking at Sput's remarks saying its just beginning and all and I look at the title of the post: "THAT storm is coming. Seems to me it isn't a meteorlogical storm we need to be worrying about - more of an argumentative storm between two discerning members of Metropol!

Well no, it's one discerning member of Metropol and.. um, Stu.

Three words though, fab make-up sex.

Nini wrote:Well no, it's one discerning member of Metropol and.. um, Stu.

My bad.

Nini wrote:Three words though, fab make-up sex.

Shome mishtake shurely? I am certain make-up would account for two words?

Only with a gimp mask and a lot of booze. The booze part is obvious, the rest so I wouldn't have to see his face and he couldn't say anything to annoy me.

To address a few earlier points.

Stuface wrote: Sput, I'm not sure whether your response was initiated by arrogance, ignorance or just plain irritation at being exposed for what you are.

Which is what? Still you've not explained

Stuface wrote:

Sput wrote:Using pretentious language and constantly trying to show up normal additions to the conversation as something they're clearly not, and using that to criticise the poster for no good reason.

Are you simply annoyed that your modus operandi had been exposed for what it is?

You've just said that, you've still not explained what you mean or why you're saying it.

Stuface wrote: I'm not playing a game, pathetic or otherwise. I'm not being malicious either; I've explained all that above. I'm not into point-scoring, I'm simply stating a point of view as best I can and hope that you take the comments on board.

Not playing a game: "Cheap win" means what then?
You've not explained the above things (being exposed for what I am, mainly). All you've done is state a set of things without even vaguely explaining WHAT THEY ARE. So HOW is this constructive criticism and not name calling?

Would you 2 please stop. It's getting to a stage where i will have to choose whos camp i'm in. It's a choice i don't want to make. So i'm going back to watching crufts. I want a puppy and i want a Manchester terrier or Jack Russell.

Connor Sephton wrote:

Nini wrote:Well no, it's one discerning member of Metropol and.. um, Stu.

My bad.

Nini wrote:Three words though, fab make-up sex.

Shome mishtake shurely? I am certain make-up would account for two words?

*sigh*

Getcha cock out and I'll arranged for it to be sucked. As long as you STFU.

Oh, sorry, Jame"z". You obviously had mistaken me for someone who gives a fuck what you thinks.

Sput wrote:No, you've called me thoroughly grown-up names JUST NOW.
Let's re-live a few!

Let's not! They've all been answered. As I said before: "End of"

Stop asking the same questions Sput!

marksi wrote:Jeez, would you two just have sex and have done with it?

I'm too fussy ya know!

StuartPlymouth wrote:

Sput wrote:No, you've called me thoroughly grown-up names JUST NOW.
Let's re-live a few!

Let's not! They've all been answered. As I said before: "End of"

End of? That's like a 10 year old saying "SO THERE"

Stop asking the same questions Sput!

I WILL IF YOU FUCKING ANSWER THEM

ONE MORE TIME. WHAT have I been exposed as?

On a topic-related topic, has anybody in the breadth of Britain received any instances of storminess in readiness for the big meteorlogical event tomorrow? I think us in the North are just having a sort of... "calm before the storm" type of thing, you know.