Page 4 of 5
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sat 12 Jan, 2008 00.21
by ashley b
Alas, I seem to have not allowed a picture of myself in the gallery all those years ago.
What a pity.
And Neil, you look fabulous dear!

Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sat 12 Jan, 2008 00.27
by ashley b
nodnirG kraM wrote:Sput wrote:I do wonder if luxton looks different.
Hard to tell .. it would appear only one picture has ever been taken of him. Either that or that is simply the one he's most proud of.
Or just the only one that's not broken the lens of the camera.
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sat 12 Jan, 2008 00.31
by all new Phil
I searched for Luxxie babes on Facebook a few weeks ago and there was a photo of him we'd not seen before. Alas, it is gone now. It looked like he was in his bedroom or something. He still looked like Anne Widdecombe.
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sat 12 Jan, 2008 09.57
by Jovis
Only Simon would have that as his profile picture.
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sat 12 Jan, 2008 12.13
by Finn
ashley b wrote:And Neil, you look fabulous dear!

Oh yes? What do you want?
And, in spite of how horrific that pic is, I would never dream of asking Nick to take the page down.
In fact, I'm surprised anyone has bothered. It's almost certainly archived at various places anyway, so it's pretty public domain now...
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sat 12 Jan, 2008 12.23
by ashley b
Jovis wrote:
Only Simon would have that as his profile picture.
Are you sure? There's another Simon Luxton with a Grange Hill logo for the main pic. Unless he has 2 accounts...
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sat 12 Jan, 2008 12.27
by Jovis
Well I did a quick search and found a few Luxxybabies, but I assumed the one with the globe must be him, as the others seemed to have pictures of themselves. Besides, what are the chances of another Simon Luxton with a life as dull as the one on TV Forum?
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sun 13 Jan, 2008 13.01
by Gavin Scott
Good grief I missed the gallery. One night on the razzle and I get online and see there's been a scandal.
Pictures that were previously submitted into the public domain technically can remain there, but I applaud Nick for his courtesy in complying with an individual's request.
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sun 13 Jan, 2008 13.03
by Sput
Spare the rod, spoil the child, as they say.
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sun 13 Jan, 2008 13.44
by cdd
I don't see why it was necessary to remove the
whole gallery..!
Here is a mirror
Re: The 2003 Picture Gallery
Posted: Sun 13 Jan, 2008 14.35
by rts
Gavin Scott wrote:Pictures that were previously submitted into the public domain technically can remain there, but I applaud Nick for his courtesy in complying with an individual's request.
Yes pictures have been voluntarily submitted into the public domain, but I also think forgiveness and common sense should prevail, and an appreciation that the actions of 17 year old, may be regretted by that same person in a more mature state of mind a few years down the line.
I too applaud Nick's courtesy in regards to this.