The 2003 Picture Gallery

Should I re-publish the 2003 gallery?

Aye
36
86%
Nay
6
14%
 
Total votes: 42
User avatar
ashley b
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat 23 Aug, 2003 14.51
Location: somewhere above the knee
Contact:

Alas, I seem to have not allowed a picture of myself in the gallery all those years ago.

What a pity.

And Neil, you look fabulous dear! ;)
*whistle*
Image
User avatar
ashley b
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat 23 Aug, 2003 14.51
Location: somewhere above the knee
Contact:

nodnirG kraM wrote:
Sput wrote:I do wonder if luxton looks different.
Hard to tell .. it would appear only one picture has ever been taken of him. Either that or that is simply the one he's most proud of.
Or just the only one that's not broken the lens of the camera.
*whistle*
Image
all new Phil
Posts: 2027
Joined: Sun 13 Feb, 2005 00.04
Location: Next door to Hell

I searched for Luxxie babes on Facebook a few weeks ago and there was a photo of him we'd not seen before. Alas, it is gone now. It looked like he was in his bedroom or something. He still looked like Anne Widdecombe.
Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

Image

Only Simon would have that as his profile picture.
User avatar
Finn
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun 06 Nov, 2005 17.02
Location: Manchester

ashley b wrote:And Neil, you look fabulous dear! ;)
Oh yes? What do you want? ;)

And, in spite of how horrific that pic is, I would never dream of asking Nick to take the page down.

In fact, I'm surprised anyone has bothered. It's almost certainly archived at various places anyway, so it's pretty public domain now...
User avatar
ashley b
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat 23 Aug, 2003 14.51
Location: somewhere above the knee
Contact:

Jovis wrote:Image

Only Simon would have that as his profile picture.
Are you sure? There's another Simon Luxton with a Grange Hill logo for the main pic. Unless he has 2 accounts...
*whistle*
Image
Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

Well I did a quick search and found a few Luxxybabies, but I assumed the one with the globe must be him, as the others seemed to have pictures of themselves. Besides, what are the chances of another Simon Luxton with a life as dull as the one on TV Forum?
User avatar
Gavin Scott
Admin
Posts: 6442
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Good grief I missed the gallery. One night on the razzle and I get online and see there's been a scandal.

Pictures that were previously submitted into the public domain technically can remain there, but I applaud Nick for his courtesy in complying with an individual's request.
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

Spare the rod, spoil the child, as they say.
Knight knight
cdd
Posts: 2633
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 14.05

I don't see why it was necessary to remove the whole gallery..!

Here is a mirror
rts
Posts: 1637
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 14.09

Gavin Scott wrote:Pictures that were previously submitted into the public domain technically can remain there, but I applaud Nick for his courtesy in complying with an individual's request.
Yes pictures have been voluntarily submitted into the public domain, but I also think forgiveness and common sense should prevail, and an appreciation that the actions of 17 year old, may be regretted by that same person in a more mature state of mind a few years down the line.

I too applaud Nick's courtesy in regards to this.
Image
Please Respond