Re: Resignation & Responsibility
Posted: Sun 11 Nov, 2007 05.40
Got to agree with Stu on all this. It's a perverse irony that the higher you get up life's greasy pole, the less culpability you have. Nick a bottle of whisky from your supermarket = end up in court. Illegally invade a country that poses no threat to you and kill thousands of innocent civilians and your own solidiers = don't end up in court.
Even if Ian Blair were to resign, he'd immediately be given another job in a high place quicker than you could say "jumping the ticket barrier". Just look at Jeffrey Archhole and Jonathan Aitken - sleazy lying crooked little shits who went to prison, but the establishment seems to think it's some terrible misunderstanding and they're actually jolly good chaps. So as soon as they got out of the clink, the offers of work started rolling in again. And look at Peter Mandelson - resigned twice after serious wrongdoings, but on each occasion was given a replacement job better and higher-paid than the one he'd just resigned from.
And while on the subject of the De Menezes case - what's the bloody point of fining the police? It's just moving a big pot of cash from one public body to another. The CPS (i.e. the taypayer) spending X amount to prosecute the Met Police (i.e. the taypayer), who then pay a huge fine of taxpayers' money back to, errr, the taxpayer. Brilliant! The Met Police will simply ask the government for more money to cover the shortfall in their budget caused by the fine, and the government will give it back to them. Fining a public body isn't a punishment. A punishment would be docking money from the salaries and pensions of those who did wrong.
Even if Ian Blair were to resign, he'd immediately be given another job in a high place quicker than you could say "jumping the ticket barrier". Just look at Jeffrey Archhole and Jonathan Aitken - sleazy lying crooked little shits who went to prison, but the establishment seems to think it's some terrible misunderstanding and they're actually jolly good chaps. So as soon as they got out of the clink, the offers of work started rolling in again. And look at Peter Mandelson - resigned twice after serious wrongdoings, but on each occasion was given a replacement job better and higher-paid than the one he'd just resigned from.
And while on the subject of the De Menezes case - what's the bloody point of fining the police? It's just moving a big pot of cash from one public body to another. The CPS (i.e. the taypayer) spending X amount to prosecute the Met Police (i.e. the taypayer), who then pay a huge fine of taxpayers' money back to, errr, the taxpayer. Brilliant! The Met Police will simply ask the government for more money to cover the shortfall in their budget caused by the fine, and the government will give it back to them. Fining a public body isn't a punishment. A punishment would be docking money from the salaries and pensions of those who did wrong.