Metropol

£600k??

Is this what socalism is really all about? :roll:

So, let me get this right then.

Up in that top-right corner, the Sun is giving me the chance to win ONE TWENTY-FOURTH of Two-Shags' annual salary.

Mmmmmmm, perhaps I won't bother buying a copy!

You get the *NUMBER 1 TELLY MAG* though.

all new Phil wrote:You get the *NUMBER 1 TELLY MAG* though.

Oh, bugger, forgot about that!

I'm off round the all night One Stop to buy one, RIGHT now.

Square Eyes wrote:Poor Ben, I'm sure this photo on his website did him no favours.

i doubt this picture did either

Would I be right in assuming that's his secretary?

Speaking of "Two Shags" Prescott, how about Blair creates an ideal new cabinet post for him ... Minister for Waste!

A perfect role for someone who is, let's face it, a completely and utterly fucking pointless waste of space!

Let's get back to the BNP.

Is there not an element of pot calling kettle black if people are trying to ban the BNP? Currently someone standing for a posistion in our student elections at the Union wants to bring in a "No Platform" policy disallowing members or supporters of the BNP to stand for election.

Hang on a sec, our Union is constantly banging on about "equal oppourtunities" and "keeping things equal" and "no discrimination". Isn't banning someone doing stuff because of the political party they support discriminative?

The BNP, in my opinion, do have some good ideas. The "Britishness" of Britain is being eroded and it's good that they're standing up for that. But while I think it's wrong to immediately write them off as "racist", I do agree that the way they go about this standing-up is extreme to say the least.

However, let's take the example of them wanting to effectively pay ethnics to go back to their homeland. Nobody's forcing them out, they're not being rounded up and taken to gas chambers. They're simply being offered incentives to leave the UK.

It could, though, be argued that by doing that, they're starting holocaust-style movement - albeit a more humane one.

Nick Harvey wrote:

Would I be right in assuming that's his secretary?

That picture is an obvious forgery - its height-to-width ratio is correct!