Page 4 of 9

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.31
by James H
I see Jamez has deleted his post alledging *****, and Bartholemew Beelzebub calling him a cunt.

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.34
by Sput
Nick Harvey wrote:
Sput wrote:Hey Nick, what were the seventies like?
Image

The jumpers were FANTASTIC and the hair was still brown.
YAY! Were those the days when you were still drinking wine from plastic cups?

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.35
by Nick Harvey
And, seeing as the other thread's no longer available for me to mention it in, I see poor old Mr Shirtlifter's had ANOTHER of his threads locked, over in the other place.

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.44
by B.E. El-Zebub
James H wrote:I see Jamez has deleted his post asking whether *************, and Bartholemew Beelzebub calling him a ****.
I'm glad he's realised that his comment was completely tasteless.

But yet again he has demonstrated his unsuitability for the role of moderator by acting in an underhand way and not posting an explanation or apology in this thread.

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.47
by Dr Lobster*
indeed, it was an utterly reprehensible thing to say - i couldn't believe he'd written it to be honest... it was low even for him.

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.52
by Finn
I imagine Gavin removed it.

However, James has now repeated the allegation - and to be fair that needs removing as well.

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.54
by James H
I haven't seen Gavin online this evening, only this afternoon.

The feeling is Jamez removed it and it was therefore wiped from our memory.

BTW I have no time for people who allege this sort of thing.

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.56
by B.E. El-Zebub
Neil Green wrote:I imagine Gavin removed it.

However, James has now repeated the allegation - and to be fair that needs removing as well.
I've edited my quote of James H's post accordingly

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.57
by James H
Bartholomew Beelzebub wrote:
Neil Green wrote:I imagine Gavin removed it.

However, James has now repeated the allegation - and to be fair that needs removing as well.
I've edited my quote of James H's post accordingly
And I've edited the original post.

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.57
by Finn
James H wrote:I haven't seen Gavin online this evening, only this afternoon.

The feeling is Jamez removed it and it was therefore wiped from our memory.

BTW I have no time for people who allege this sort of thing.
He's been online - as I've been discussing it with him by messenger.

Perhaps you could just edit out the allegation. It's actually libellous and I really would prefer it was not repeated.

Posted: Sat 14 Jan, 2006 19.58
by Finn
Bartholomew Beelzebub wrote:
Neil Green wrote:I imagine Gavin removed it.

However, James has now repeated the allegation - and to be fair that needs removing as well.
I've edited my quote of James H's post accordingly
Thank you. Can I ask James to follow the pattern that Bartholomew has used?