Page 4 of 6

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.38
by iSon
Jealous? Well no, more just miffed - but I guess it's because like others here feel - there's no need for another mod here. But the fact it's you makes it worse.

Name...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/pho ... 371425.stm - Picture 14

OK - not easily known as you...but...I would add - if you're not willing to let your identity be truly known then why are you still posting? You levelled a similar criticism at Sideshow Ed for not revealing who he is.

At the end of the day, you don't have to go out of your way to let people know who you are, but on the same wavelength - you shouldn't be afraid your comments be associated with you.

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.41
by Jamez
Posting on the BBC site is different to here.

This place is associated with all sorts of banter and personal opinion (quite rightly), but it is entirely my decision whether or not I wish my full name to be posted on here, which I don't.

You don't seem to be able to grasp that, though!

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.44
by Si-Co
Isonstine wrote: Name...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/pho ... 371425.stm - Picture 14
I think you have already made your point, James. Your signature reveals Jamez's last name to anyone who is still in any doubt. You are now making this a personal attack against Jamez, and quite frankly it's also very boring and tiresome to read.

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.46
by iSon
I'm afraid it has to be case of if you don't want the words by your name then don't post.

I've found this out on other forum's - I got a telling off from my former line manager for posting something purely anecdotle on Media UK about a company I was freelancing for.

Sadly it happens and this is the consequence of modern life when it comes to the internet.

It's one of those.

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.46
by Whataday
Sheesh, on second thoughts, I'll stay gay. I'm sure there's a club open here somewhere...

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.48
by Si-Co
Whataday wrote:Sheesh, on second thoughts, I'll stay gay. I'm sure there's a club open here somewhere...
Could do with a shag myself tonight.

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.49
by Jamez
It's only a consequence when thoughtless and dare-I-say-it, bloody-minded people like yourself do it intentionally to annoy.

You're just making yourself look very, very childish by continually ignoring repeated requests to remove your signature and to stop using my surname on this, or any other website.

As for being "found out" on Media UK, well that just shows that you didn't bother to cover your tracks well enough when you decided to post something on a site which could be viewed by your boss.

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.50
by James H
James P, you've changed your name, and while I appreciate you don't want the past being dragged up from metropol, there's not much point in making James I change his sig.

As for James I well you have power on TVF so use it to overturn Charlie and the morons. As a reasonably intelligent 15 year old poster I get so pissed off when looking at the rubbish that's plonked on there at the moment.

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.52
by Si-Co
[b]James[/b] H wrote:James, you've changed your name, and while I appreciate you don't want the past being dragged up from metropol, there's not much point in making James change his sig.

As for James well you have power on TVF so use it to overturn Charlie and the morons. As a reasonably intelligent 15 year old poster I get so pissed off when looking at the rubbish that's plonked on there at the moment.
I'm confused! :?

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.53
by Jamez
James H wrote:James, you've changed your name, and while I appreciate you don't want the past being dragged up from metropol, there's not much point in making James change his sig.
I have indeed changed my name via UK deedpoll, but a lot of people such as former business associates, bosses etc. still use Google, and if they ran a detailed search, they would link me to TVF & MP247.

It's not much that I ask, so I really don't see why Isonstine is being such a pain about it.

Posted: Wed 28 Dec, 2005 00.55
by iSon
Si-Co wrote:
Isonstine wrote: Name...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/pho ... 371425.stm - Picture 14
I think you have already made your point, James. Your signature reveals Jamez's last name to anyone who is still in any doubt. You are now making this a personal attack against Jamez, and quite frankly it's also very boring and tiresome to read.
I'm sorry that it look 30 seconds out of your precious life.

I find it very amusing I'm getting accused of a "personal attack" - especially since ol' Jamez was the master at them himself.

I wouldn't mind if he'd done no wrong and so on...but for me I find Jamez's stance to be very hypocritical. That's the problem I have (among others :lol: )