Metropol

If it's featuring me then you have my personal seal of approval to go ahead with it. I will not take offence.

James Martin wrote:If it's featuring me then you have my personal seal of approval to go ahead with it. I will not take offence.

Oh it's not offensive - just very tongue-in-cheek.

I don't care - make the bugger. I do not mind.

Hear this powers, I do not mind.

*ahem*

Gavin Scott wrote:

Jamez wrote:

James Martin wrote:What's this about the mocks? Throroughly dissapointed. Always a source of a giggle.

I know, but the powers that be don't like them.

Which is a shame, because Sput and I were working on a fab pisstake featuring you, James!

What "powers"? Where?

Jamez wrote:

James Martin wrote:What's this about the mocks? Throroughly dissapointed. Always a source of a giggle.

I know, but the powers that be don't like them.

It's not that the powers don't like them, it is the fact that you can give but can't take.

For instance, remember the MP3 mock you did of Max being forced to perform oral sex on his father.

Isn't it bizzare you can do this, but when somebody suggests that you were fathered in a carpark and your mum doesn't know who you dad is because all 12 men involved in the incident were wearing crash helmuts you get a bit upset?

YOU ARE A TYPICAL BULLY.

Jamez wrote:

cat wrote:I know.

But I thought that as it brought even more attention to you - as if having about four threads already open on the subject of your life wasn't enough - then you'd appreciate it.

Remarkable coincidence, though.

Seeing as you are a major contributer to the aforementioned threads (albeit posting under the name of 'Bones'), then I don't particularly see what your moaning on about.

You are very wrong, I'm afraid.

Much though I admire Bones and Dusty Jacket giving you what you deserve, my interest in your posts is such that I generally go out of my way to avoid them, not follow them up.

And I can spell 'helmet'. Bones cannot.

I'm not happy.

I have twice asked whom exactly is disallowing piss-take mocks being made, only to be ignored.

James Martin, in a fit of egomania, is now also sporting a signature suggesting that mocks (particularly about himself) should be allowed.

No one at any time on this board has suggested these are not allowed; and I resent the implication that we have. As I have said, the flood-gates are open for all and sundry to tear strips off each other. It is the only way to be fair on an otherwise hardly-moderated forum.

Either tell me who is stopping your fun, or get rid of the reference in your signatures.

Thank you.

cat wrote:

Jamez wrote:

cat wrote:I know.

But I thought that as it brought even more attention to you - as if having about four threads already open on the subject of your life wasn't enough - then you'd appreciate it.

Remarkable coincidence, though.

Seeing as you are a major contributer to the aforementioned threads (albeit posting under the name of 'Bones'), then I don't particularly see what your moaning on about.

You are very wrong, I'm afraid.

Much though I admire Bones and Dusty Jacket giving you what you deserve, my interest in your posts is such that I generally go out of my way to avoid them, not follow them up.

And I can spell 'helmet'. Bones cannot.

Are you not one and the same?

Wow.

You really are amazingly stupid.

I know people say it but... god.

cat wrote:Wow.

You really are amazingly stupid.

I know people say it but... god.

Don't worry about James Martin he has not taken his anti-depressant today.

Once the drug has taken effect, James Martin is insightful, reflective, intelligent and a joy to be around.

Bones wrote:

cat wrote:Wow.

You really are amazingly stupid.

I know people say it but... god.

Don't worry about James Martin he has not taken his anti-depressant today.

Once the drug has taken effect, James Martin is insightful, reflective, intelligent and a joy to be around.

The prescription ran out four years ago then?