Page 26 of 118

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Mon 19 Jan, 2009 17.46
by Ronnie Rowlands
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the Hovis advert yet. It's very brilliant. What confused me was that there were no defining moments oh the 90s included. It's as though the formation of the Spice Girls and the opening of Channel 5 were unimportant and forgettable.

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Mon 19 Jan, 2009 18.03
by Alexia
Ronnie Rowlands wrote:I'm surprised no one has mentioned the Hovis advert yet. It's very brilliant. What confused me was that there were no defining moments oh the 90s included. It's as though the formation of the Spice Girls and the opening of Channel 5 were unimportant and forgettable.
Forgive me for going all Tumbly Wumbly, but the full Hovis ad doesn't feature the 20s, 30s, 50s* or 70s either.
1890s - Boy buys loaf
1912 - Titanic / suffragettes
1914 - Start of WWI
1941 - The Blitz
* Either 1945 - VE Day or 1953 - Coronation of Queen Liz
1966 - England winning World Cup
1984 - Miners' strike
2000 - Millennium

Apparently it lasts 122 seconds (1 for each year since the product was first made).

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Mon 19 Jan, 2009 18.19
by Ronnie Rowlands
Alexia wrote:
Ronnie Rowlands wrote:I'm surprised no one has mentioned the Hovis advert yet. It's very brilliant. What confused me was that there were no defining moments oh the 90s included. It's as though the formation of the Spice Girls and the opening of Channel 5 were unimportant and forgettable.
Forgive me for going all Tumbly Wumbly, but the full Hovis ad doesn't feature ...70s either.
Well why the big collars just after the World cup scene?

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Mon 19 Jan, 2009 20.01
by Alexia
Ronnie Rowlands wrote:
Alexia wrote:
Ronnie Rowlands wrote:I'm surprised no one has mentioned the Hovis advert yet. It's very brilliant. What confused me was that there were no defining moments oh the 90s included. It's as though the formation of the Spice Girls and the opening of Channel 5 were unimportant and forgettable.
Forgive me for going all Tumbly Wumbly, but the full Hovis ad doesn't feature ...70s either.
Well why the big collars just after the World cup scene?
Well spotted - not sure what it signifies, although there is an ethnic minority couple shown quite prominently - perhaps a reference to the social upheaval of the 70s.

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Mon 19 Jan, 2009 20.20
by Nini
Just me thinking that discussing the Hovis ad is a bit like... um, stale bread?

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Mon 19 Jan, 2009 20.21
by Alexia
Nini wrote:Just me thinking that discussing the Hovis ad is a bit like... um, stale bread?
"Is that you home love?"

"Yeah"

"What took you so long?"

"You wouldn't believe me if I told you..."

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Mon 19 Jan, 2009 23.48
by Chie
I love the T-Mobile advert. Nice to see an advert that focuses on cheering it's audience up and making them happy, especially with the economic situation, as opposed to shamelessly shoving yet another product down our throats.

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Tue 20 Jan, 2009 12.20
by Andrew Wood
Just seen a Swiftcover insurance ad with Iggy Pop. Now that's weird.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yYnydYrZPp8

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Tue 20 Jan, 2009 12.32
by Gavin Scott
Andrew Wood wrote:Just seen a Swiftcover insurance ad with Iggy Pop. Now that's weird.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yYnydYrZPp8
They're also using that as a sponsorship bumper for Sky's Sci-fi strand (including Futurama).

He's difficult to look at, isn't he?

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Tue 20 Jan, 2009 13.17
by Nini
I didn't really think much of the PG Tips ad upon my first watch of it, several repeated viewings haven't warmed me to it.

Re: Adverts which irritate and entertain

Posted: Wed 21 Jan, 2009 18.26
by Alexia
The latest Direct Line ads intrigue me. Stephen Fry and Paul Merton are apparently not the best of buddies after the Angus Deayton sacking from HIGNFY (Fry thought the treatment of Deayton was akin to bullying and unjustified). So, unless they were recorded separately and without knowledge of who the other voice was to be, I find it unlikely that they would appear together as the voices of the Direct Line Phone and Mouse.

Unless they're done by impressionists.