Metropol

Sput wrote:I see, I see. It's only childish when *I* criticise.

Yes, in the way you decided to label my posts with your own definition of psycho-analytical terms. It's not contributing to the thread, it's needlessly disrupting it.

I'll look at any questions you have unanswered in another thread, but in the meantime - don't make this board-wide; it's not pleasant for everyone else, so please keep it confined to one place!

StuartPlymouth wrote:

Sput wrote:I see, I see. It's only childish when *I* criticise.

Yes, in the way you decided to label my posts with your own definition of psycho-analytical terms. It's not contributing to the thread, it's needlessly disrupting it.

my god stuart will you SHUT UP. You're the one who took the thread off topic in the first place with your baseless accusation. You've them droned on and on all evening about how dreadful sput is when, if nothing else, he isn't a complete bore like yourself.

This ends NOW.

Connor Sephton wrote:

Sput wrote:#1. Patronising, derogatory.

Until you answer my questions in the other thread, stu, I'm going to label every passive-aggressive insult you make.

Stay tuned to us here on Metropol as Sput's niceness week is in continuum.

Last week, Sput gave notice that his niceness week had been rescinded in the case of Stuart.

Oh my.

This is the bit where Sput logs in cursing every user in sight with profanities, a deep, deep contrast to his week of pleasantness. .

Connor Sephton wrote:Oh my!

No. He extended his period of self-proclaimed (and self-promoting) "niceness week" for a further period (except for myself and Mr Grindon, apparently, although why he's added him I have no idea).

Arrogance personified!

StuartPlymouth wrote:

Connor Sephton wrote:Oh my!

No. He extended his period of self-proclaimed (and self-promoting) "niceness week" for a further period (except for myself and Mr Grindon, apparently, although why he's added him I have no idea).

Arrogance personified!

Yup, I'm basically a french Hitler at this stage.

Sput wrote:

StuartPlymouth wrote:

Connor Sephton wrote:Oh my!

No. He extended his period of self-proclaimed (and self-promoting) "niceness week" for a further period (except for myself and Mr Grindon, apparently, although why he's added him I have no idea).

Arrogance personified!

Yup, I'm basically a french Hitler at this stage.

In the immortal words of Basil Fawlty, "This is exactly how Nazi Germany started. A lot of layabouts with nothing better to do than to cause trouble."

I'm sure a moderator should at least know his SPAG (spelling, punctuation and grammar) rules.

I am shocked that Bail, being the super-duper student he is (See his Media Tabloidism mock) uses "bare in mind" and "library's" in his reply to Barcode's Music Library request post in Media Websites.

I don't mind the od speling misstake, but those are just lazy.

Alexia wrote:I'm sure a moderator should at least know his SPAG (spelling, punctuation and grammar) rules.

And I'm sure that most people know there's no point putting an acronym if you're going to explain what it stands for and not use it again

What exactly is wrong with "bare in mind" ?

Bail wrote:What exactly is wrong with "bare in mind" ?

It should be bear (as in, "to carry") in mind.