bilky asko wrote:cityprod wrote:bilky asko wrote:Ian Beaumont Live and Direct
Home to the 3 and a half minute travel bulletin for a population of approximately 33,500.
Special treat in the latest edition: the mangling of the Spanish language in the pronunciation of Sonido Urbano.
So? Are you saying you've never tripped over your own tongue speaking? I find that hard to believe.
If you don't care for the show, that's fine. You don't have to listen, you can go somewhere else and find a show you enjoy more.
There's a difference between misspeaking and not bothering to check the pronunciation of a group you were featuring on your show. The former is normal, the latter is unprofessional and smacks of amateurism.
Okay, you are talking complete nonsense here. One, not only did I check how to pronounce the name, but two, I said it pretty much correctly, for someone who had never learned Spanish or Portuguese, and the word Sonido actually appears in both languages. Also, if somebody's pronouncing a foreign name in a different language for the first few times, they are usually given a small amount of leeway. Apparently, you don't give me any leeway though.
cityprod wrote:But because I live that way, it brings me into conflict with the likes of Martin and Bilky, who often know what to think and do, but not always how to think about things and make your own decisions about things. Just accepting the way it is and not questioning things is one way to live and a perfectly reasonable one. It's just not the way I want to live. But apparently, some people don't seem to accept that others can choose to be different, and they try to interpret it in a way that they can handle. So, I get called autistic or crazy or something else. I get mocked because I choose the road less travelled by.
This is the sort of post I don't appreciate, the generalisations made about people. When someone disagrees with him, apparently that means that they are not a free thinker if they happen to agree with mainstream consensus or opinion (or what he perceives to be the case). Then the over-dramatised personal attacks and comparisons to US right-wing radio hosts begin.
Well, this is how you and so many others come across to me. People spout things that are easily disproved, they get called on it, they try to rebut the calling out, with evidence that does not stand up, and has been spread from some dubious media source, usually the Daily Mail or some other paper of that ilk, and then they don't like it when they get rightfully compared to the right wing muck spreaders that tend to populate talk radio, with most of the worst examples being from the US. "Over-dramatised personal attacks"? You have a weird idea of what a personal attack is, because being called out factually for things people have said has suddenly become a personal attack, yet apparently it's not a personal attack to harass and cyberbully someone and call them names behind their back? Projecting much?
I am the first to admit that I don't leave comments be, if only because it makes it look like that people are giving his posts some level of credence. The problem is that he has an inability to concede a point in the face of evidence, in classic David Icke style.
Depends on the strength of the evidence, and since most 'evidence' that gets presented is at best, circumstantial and at worst completely irrelevant, most of it gets the short shrift it deserves.
The reason his radio show is pointed out is because of how he constantly argues with actual radio professionals, and states that his abysmal programme on Source FM is in some way good and how "radio should be done". If you haven't listened to it, please do. It will give you a great insight into the level of blind arrogance he has about his knowledge and abilities.
I have had discussions with other radio professionals, and have found a culture of people that believes only they have the knowledge and their way is the one 'twue' way of doing radio, and frankly with the likes of Spotify and people's own iPods being able to provide better music mixes than any radio station ever could, commercial radio's blind devotion to non-stop music mixes is frankly baffling, where they should be focussing more on providing interesting content rather than just non-stop music. So in my radio show, I try to make sure there's the content that I think the listener needs to have and wants to hear, not just the usual non-stop music and irrelevant celeb gossip. If commercial radio is to survive, it needs to move away from non-stop music, and updates that barely scratch the surface, I seriously believe that.
Now, if you believe that my vision is wrong, you're free to believe that, but I have yet to meet anyone in the industry who I believe has any real clue about how to handle the likes of Spotify and Pandora, and iPods and podcasts. I have yet to talk to anyone who really understands where commercial radio's future lies and it's not in non-stop music. But that's an honest opinion formed from the discussions I've had. Now, if you think my view of interesting content is wrong, well, you're welcome to think that.
But giving radio professionals respect just because they are radio professionals, is misplaced. The people in the industry that I do respect, are the ones who actually listen and actually work hard on producing solid content, or have solid foundations for their advice. Those who just think they should be respected because they are or have been a radio professional don't earn it in my book.