Metropol

Martin Norris wrote:

Sput wrote:Ah but do they define win as more votes, more seats or overall majority?

Overall majority.

barcode wrote:

barcode wrote:what I don't understand is why labour, while spending all this NEEDED increase on public service, did spend more in wiping out the debt? I know he use the 24 billion 3G network sell off to help decrease but he could have done more will keeping public spending on the up.

It seems there did: it did start to go back up, was that not at the same point in time as the pointless wars begin?

http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/uk-ec ... onal-debt/

GMTV2009 wrote:
I do hope there's a complementary PowerPoint to go with that graph. And a speech.

Sput wrote:

GMTV2009 wrote:
I do hope there's a complementary PowerPoint to go with that graph. And a speech.

If there's one thing shitter than a shit reply, it's a shit reply that takes more than a day to produce.

GMTV2009 wrote:

Sput wrote:

GMTV2009 wrote:
I do hope there's a complementary PowerPoint to go with that graph. And a speech.

If there's one thing shitter than a shit reply, it's a shit reply that takes more than a day to produce.

Awkward pause. Ah, yes, so back to the Budget eh?

But seriously, I think I must have lost the plot by then, and apologies for what my mind at that time must of thought would be funny.

GMTV2009 wrote:

Sput wrote:

GMTV2009 wrote:
I do hope there's a complementary PowerPoint to go with that graph. And a speech.

If there's one thing shitter than a shit reply, it's a shit reply that takes more than a day to produce.

Awkward pause. Ah, yes, so back to the Budget eh?

But seriously, I think I must have lost the plot by then, and apologies for what my mind at that time must of thought would be funny.

GMTV2009 wrote:But seriously, I think I must have lost the plot by then, and apologies for what my mind at that time must of thought would be funny.