Are you simply annoyed that your modus operandi had been exposed for what it is? The only peoples' views I have criticised have been in a well-mannered debate, certainly nothing selected for serious discussion that wasn't said in earnest. I would mention "pots & kettles", but that probably wouldn't be pretentious enough for you!Sput wrote:Using pretentious language and constantly trying to show up normal additions to the conversation as something they're clearly not, and using that to criticise the poster for no good reason.
You're wrong, Sput. I'm trying to be helpful and constructive.Sput wrote:StuartPlymouth wrote:I'm sure everyone is aware by now of your delusions of self-importance Sput, but I've not noticed anyone posting on here simply to impress you or anyone else.
It's a discussion forum, not a place for ego posturing.Sput wrote:I honestly think you're wrong and fucking rude.
All I do here is post stuff. If someone says something that's plain wrong, I try and make them see why. If they piss me off continually, I'm rude to them. If they post something I disagree with, I argue with them.
Your general style is aggressive, demeaning and generally intended to ridicule the poster's comments; especially if you think they won't respond and you can get away with a "cheap win" with those reading your well-contrived comments.
Your comments can be humorous, and I have also had many well-meaning debates with you. But you should perhaps keep some of that superior intellectual attitude tucked away back in its box on ocassion rather than aiming for the "quick quip" at someone else's expense.
