Posted: Thu 03 May, 2007 22.54
Do you mean "for all intents and purposes"?cdd wrote:Well for all intensive purposes
Do you mean "for all intents and purposes"?cdd wrote:Well for all intensive purposes
I love it when people read the whole thread...Aston wrote:Do you mean "for all intents and purposes"?cdd wrote:Well for all intensive purposes
Damn it! I had it, but couldn't find a working example in my etymology reference to back it up.cdd wrote:4/5 (You missed "Off their own back", which should be "bat").Gavin Scott wrote:I was also sure this was meant to be ironic.cdd wrote: Well for all intensive purposes, Stuart, they're doing it off their own back; it's a bit of a damp squid to try and stem the tired of English errors when most people could care less!
"For all intents and purposes"
"Damp squib" (as in a pyrotechnic charge which won't fire because it has become wet)
"Stem the tide"
"Couldn't care less" - as opposed to the American "could care less" (which makes no sense)
Yes, i heard another TV announcer saying 'haich' the other day too. It's totally unacceptable that people who are paid to speak, but mispronounce words, aren't fired on the spot... I mean voiceover-ing isn't the most taxing of jobs anyway, and any mistakes are inexcusable.James Vertigan wrote:ITV1 announcer has just said "Haitch" when talking about H.G. Wells
Sums it up nicely.People who prounonce the letter H, haich
You sound like fucking dunces. It''s pronounced aich. Though I doubt there is a right spelling for this sound, I certainly don''t doubt that (if there were infact a proper spelling) it does not, and never has, had the letter H at the front of it. Where the fuck are you getting this ''huh'' sound from? You wouldn''t say Buh-bee or Muh-em for the letters B & M would you? No. You would say bee and em. So stop doing it with the letter H, it sounds awful and makes you sound like the thick, ignorant cunt that you obviously are.