Page 3 of 15
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 17.10
by James Hatts
Jamez wrote:Either way, my private life is private and it's not really any concern of yours what I do, is it!
Strange, that, when you seem to find other people's private lives - such as Simon Luxton's - endlessly fascinating.
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 17.20
by Jamez
......
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 17.55
by johnnyboy
Jamez wrote:Don't for one second say that I'm the only one who joins in with the Luxton fracas, because I ain't! I think you'll find JB has more issues with Luxton than I do.
I have absolutely no issues with Luxton at all.
It's just purile banter that everyone finds themselves on the end of occasionally on the interweb.
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 18.16
by Pete
Jamez wrote:James Hatts wrote:Jamez wrote:Either way, my private life is private and it's not really any concern of yours what I do, is it!
Strange, that, when you seem to find other people's private lives - such as Simon Luxton's - endlessly fascinating.
I know nothing about Luxton apart from his facination with clocks, old idents and grange hill. Oh, and he lives with his parents at 32 and relies on them to provide his sky telly.
i thought you knew he was a *****
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 18.40
by Jamez
......
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 18.45
by johnnyboy
Hyma and Jamez, you know I am far the the world's most anal mod but please don't use those words so directly to express what you think.
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 18.53
by Gavin Scott
Jamez wrote:No, I haven't said that.
What I said was: .........
Even I am utterly offended by that statement, so lord knows what Simon must think.
Jamez, for a person who is working in the communications industry, you are going to have to realise that the semantics of your comments is irrelevant.
I won't allow these very serious accusations to be thrown around regarding a member who doesn't have the luxury of anonimity by masquerading under made-up user names.
You are on notice, sir, that you will be banned without further discussion if you repeat these comments on this board again.
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 19.00
by Jamez
......
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 19.05
by marksi
James Hatts wrote:(I'll doubtless be shot down in flames for this, but anyway...)
I don't agree with much that Simon Luxton says re. television or politics or anything else, but I do feel that some of the attacks on him in the 'Cancelling Sky' thread (once again) crossed the line of good taste or humour into really quite unpleasant personal abuse.
Granted, Simon does himself few favours with many of his contributions to TVF, but all the same I am quite uncomfortable with some of the abuse that is meted out to him.
Agreed, which is why I tried to be unusually helpful.
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 19.05
by Aston
Jamez wrote:Oh single me out why don't you!
Bloody hell! Hyma came along half an hour ago and completely misquoted me from the other day, so I put the record straight.
I'm sick to the back teeth of Luxton and Luxton-related chit-chat.
So much so I've really had enough. Feel free to ban me, Gavin. No, in fact delete my account and all the posts I've ever made.
Ta ta - it was fun... until about 6 months ago.
xx
Bloody hell James, you must hold the record for the highest number of "bye bye, I'm going" messages over the years!
Posted: Fri 23 Jun, 2006 19.11
by Dr Lobster*
if his record over at tv forum is anything to go by, we'll be getting another 37 of these bye bye messages.
now he isn't posting on the forum he at least can spend more of his valuble time taking photos of himself, oh and on his business too. nearly forgot about that.