Page 3 of 4

Posted: Thu 15 Sep, 2005 21.26
by babyben
tillyoshea wrote:
babyben wrote:No website is better than a badly designed one for a business.
Does that get an award for the most ambiguous statement written on here in a very long time? Though the meaning is clear from the context, it still amused me... Having said that, most things do...
It's not ambiguous. Don't have a shite website for your business. Simple.

Posted: Thu 15 Sep, 2005 21.30
by tillyoshea
babyben wrote:
tillyoshea wrote:
babyben wrote:No website is better than a badly designed one for a business.
Does that get an award for the most ambiguous statement written on here in a very long time? Though the meaning is clear from the context, it still amused me... Having said that, most things do...
It's not ambiguous. Don't have a shite website for your business. Simple.
But that's only one of two ways of reading what you've written. Which could also read as a badly designed website is better for your business than any other. See?

Posted: Thu 15 Sep, 2005 22.03
by babyben
tillyoshea wrote:
babyben wrote:
tillyoshea wrote: Does that get an award for the most ambiguous statement written on here in a very long time? Though the meaning is clear from the context, it still amused me... Having said that, most things do...
It's not ambiguous. Don't have a shite website for your business. Simple.
But that's only one of two ways of reading what you've written. Which could also read as a badly designed website is better for your business than any other. See?
No.

Posted: Thu 15 Sep, 2005 22.15
by tillyoshea
babyben wrote:
tillyoshea wrote:
babyben wrote: It's not ambiguous. Don't have a shite website for your business. Simple.
But that's only one of two ways of reading what you've written. Which could also read as a badly designed website is better for your business than any other. See?
No.
"No website is better than a badly designed one for a business"

1. Having no website is better than having a badly designed one.
2. There is no better website than a badly designed one - ie. Good websites are not as good for your business as badly designed ones.

Posted: Thu 15 Sep, 2005 22.53
by Sput
tillyoshea wrote:1. Having no website is better than having a badly designed one.
2. There is no better website than a badly designed one - ie. Good websites are not as good for your business as badly designed ones.
I read it was #2 as I expect it's babyben's excuse for being a shit web designer.

Posted: Fri 16 Sep, 2005 00.26
by Pete
Sput wrote:
tillyoshea wrote:1. Having no website is better than having a badly designed one.
2. There is no better website than a badly designed one - ie. Good websites are not as good for your business as badly designed ones.
I read it was #2 as I expect it's babyben's excuse for being a shit web designer.
well they were always quite well designed - they just never got past the vapourware stage. hence hedgehoax online

Posted: Fri 16 Sep, 2005 00.33
by babyben
Sput wrote:
tillyoshea wrote:1. Having no website is better than having a badly designed one.
2. There is no better website than a badly designed one - ie. Good websites are not as good for your business as badly designed ones.
I read it was #2 as I expect it's babyben's excuse for being a shit web designer.
Your right I am a shit web designer, at least I don't have a ugly face like yours. 8)

Posted: Fri 16 Sep, 2005 01.43
by Sput
Hymagumba wrote:well they were always quite well designed - they just never got past the vapourware stage. hence hedgehoax online
Ah yes, because then, like now, Scrounger had very little in the way of substance to offer. Remember the shennanegans of naming radio stations after noble gases? Those were the days, old friend.

As for what you think of my face, babyben/scrounger, you are in no position to comment. If I'm right about who you are then you ming. If I'm wrong then you're too cowardly to even post your mug - which I imagine will have slightly disproportionate extremeties. Certainly you type as though you have six fingers.

YOU ARE MORE THAN WELCOME TO PROVE ME WRONG.
babyben wrote:at least i don't have an ugly face like yours 8)
Good god! I just realised you're PROUD of that comeback, aren't you! Fucking hell!

Posted: Fri 16 Sep, 2005 14.36
by babyben
Sput wrote: As for what you think of my face, babyben/scrounger, you are in no position to comment. If I'm right about who you are then you ming. If I'm wrong then you're too cowardly to even post your mug - which I imagine will have slightly disproportionate extremeties. Certainly you type as though you have six fingers.

YOU ARE MORE THAN WELCOME TO PROVE ME WRONG.
I admit it, I am someone else - I'm the baby jesus ffs. :roll:

Posted: Fri 16 Sep, 2005 18.36
by Lorns
babyben wrote:
Sput wrote:
tillyoshea wrote:1. Having no website is better than having a badly designed one.
2. There is no better website than a badly designed one - ie. Good websites are not as good for your business as badly designed ones.
I read it was #2 as I expect it's babyben's excuse for being a shit web designer.
Your right I am a shit web designer, at least I don't have a ugly face like yours. 8)

That's my mind made up! I won't be asking you for help when i'm ready to design one for my business. It would be like, the blind leading the blind ;)


Two words i would never put together are; Sput and Ugly face.
Sput has a happy, pretty face. If he was a girl i'd scratch his eyes out ;)
The headwear is peculiar, but, each to their own i suppose.

Posted: Fri 16 Sep, 2005 22.07
by Sput
miss hellfire wrote: The headwear is peculiar, but, each to their own i suppose.
It's to keep my enormous brain cool, you see. Us rocket scientists have to be very careful!

As for this talk of eye mutilation, I'm not sure whether it's meant as an insult or a compliment! Care to enlighten me?