Metropol

I'm assuming guests don't mean us hidden sort either, does it?

Slagathor. wrote:EDIT: Is this good?

Get rid of the glow around the body text (which seems unneeded) and I'll be OK with it.

Gavin Scott wrote:I think it just means they're on the front page.

You're clever you are.

Good good, I can now Adblock that particular image. I often do that with such signatures as that ghastly ITV Saturday one.

I have the old option not to view images in signatures switched on so I won't see it and not give a flying fuck about it any further.

On an odder note, my rant and pretty much anything during the saturdaymorning incident have vanished. The bastards.

Jovis wrote:I often do that with such signatures as that ghastly ITV Saturday one.

Oh yes, that one's a particular eyesore.

Nini wrote:I have the old option not to view images in signatures switched on so I won't see it and not give a flying fuck about it any further.

Ah, but you might miss a gem of a signature, so I leave them on just in case.

Nini wrote:On an odder note, my rant and pretty much anything during the saturdaymorning incident have vanished. The bastards.

As I've said before, they are doing themselves no favours by removing the most interesting content.

Actually, I don't think I got as far as reading your post in that thread - would you be willing to reconstruct it for us all to enjoy, or is that just too dull to be bothered with?

Jovis wrote:Ah, but you might miss a gem of a signature, so I leave them on just in case.

I might miss one but the ratio of crap to gems is far too high for my liking.

Jovis wrote:As I've said before, they are doing themselves no favours by removing the most interesting content.

That's very true, conflict with truly annoying members and zip archive based humour is what has kept the forum alive for me. That and the occasional fab remark from the locals here. One libellous comment and now nobody's allowed to say anything, pff.

What happened to proper debate and not ones about Luxton's choice of "opinion as fact" debating which is as good as it's getting right now.

Jovis wrote:Actually, I don't think I got as far as reading your post in that thread - would you be willing to reconstruct it for us all to enjoy, or is that just too dull to be bothered with?

Hmm, probably not, very spur of the moment these things and it's hard to recollect a rant when someone deletes or... I dunno, edits out most of the good parts of your rant at Greggybaby from Quizmania.

EDIT: Make a note, I will kill SN2005 if he keeps this shit up. Now back to the forum discussion, I'm not the biggest thing there.

Anybody else think pad is becoming a right little forum nazi wading in and moaning about there being two ITV threads and which one should be closed? Put that together with his frequently aggressive attitude and he's a right little dirty stain on the board.

noelfirl wrote:Anybody else think pad is becoming a right little forum nazi....

No, I think pad just likes his Excel spreadsheet work on the ITV schedules to get maximum readership!

I wish he would do one for STV