Page 127 of 844
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 14.36
by Pete
I am being currently being annoyed by two members in particular over on the other place
davidlees, does nothing aside from follow around tumble tower defending his idiocy.
jrothwell is a moron who attempts to be a member of the clique but fails nonstop.
in related news, stuartplymouth has been much less annoying in the last week. This pleases me.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 14.53
by onetrickpony
Oh so there is a clique then?
When was the first ever train picture used on TVF and who for?
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 14.56
by Nick Harvey
Only one member (now of both places) is annoying me to the point of utter distraction.
He's so bloody annoying that he's largely put me off posting here this week.
He's now even polluted my 13amp Plug thread with his upporling spalling.
onetrickpony wrote:When was the first ever train picture used on TVF and who for?
Can't remember when and for whom, but it was the original Class 43 picture, with the train going the opposite way, and it was used by fusionlad.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 15.01
by onetrickpony
Is that 62305 who claims to have dyslexia? I always doubted he did, but each to their own.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 15.07
by Nick Harvey
onetrickpony wrote:I always doubted he did.
I tend to support your opinion on this, and always have.
My view is that he, she or it is just a very, very, very obnoxious wind-up merchant.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 15.33
by Skytower
Nick Harvey wrote:onetrickpony wrote:I always doubted he did.
I tend to support your opinion on this, and always have.
My view is that he, she or it is just a very, very, very obnoxious wind-up merchant.
It's a very elaborate wind-up (or someone who doesn't give up easily) seeing as they're into the thousands-of-posts zone over at TVF.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 16.30
by Square Eyes
We are steadily seeing the erosion of the community away from the articulate members with something interesting to contribute to the morons.
You can actually get a better class of conversation at Digital Spy these days.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 16.49
by Nick Harvey
Skytower wrote:It's a very elaborate wind-up (or someone who doesn't give up easily) seeing as they're into the thousands-of-posts zone over at TVF.
Once you get into a style, it's pretty easy to stick with it.
Look at soap actors, for instance; some of them have been regularly switching into a particular style, not their own, for years and years.
I'm not convinced that longevity has to equal truth.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 17.07
by Lorns
I must be the only person who doesn't let members from there or here get on my nerves. I have trouble sometimetimes deciphering 623058s posts but i don't let it get to me.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 17.17
by Ronnie Rowlands
Indeed. Although sometimes, I know what he's saying, but have no idea what he's getting at. He said a LOT of things I didn't get in the Doctor Who thread.
I still don;t like it how there have done this FILM .......... Many years later Some Bad war happen everyone died....... he changes bodys............some more years....... new TV docoter who!.
Re: TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
Posted: Sat 01 Sep, 2007 17.56
by james2001
onetrickpony wrote:Is that 62305 who claims to have dyslexia? I always doubted he did, but each to their own.
I don't, there's no way a genuine wind-up merchant would be able to keep up the act for as long as he has.
There's someone on another forum I post on who's clearly on a wind-up and has been doing it for a good couple of years, but he only pops up every now and then (likely when the person responsible gets bored or has too much free time) then vanishes again for several months.