Nini wrote:Is there a point behind this? I said the Daily Mail set, to me that encompasses a mindset, not simply what newspaper they read and as the Daily Mail is usually the one mewling the loudest and most divisively about stupid issues then you can use it with some amount of confidence most would understand what the term means.
If you read the paper for anything beyond your daily dose of right wing lulz then I just don't know about you.
I don't read the Daily Mail, Nini. To me the Daily Mail is a homophobic, slightly racist, the-world-hates-me-because-I'm-a-man newspaper.
It's a bit like when you're (or were) at school and the popular kid (Ross/Brand) is picking on the geeky kid (Sachs) in lesson. Everyone laughs at the popular kid, because they want to be seen as popular by association and it's just the normal thing to do. Then when everyone leaves school and grows up, they look back and realise what a c*nt the popular kid was.
Lorns wrote:Quite the little wallflower isn't she.
She's a right slag. But I wouldn't go and tell her granddad that :roll: