Metropol

Yeah, our women or something... I am paraphrasing ysee.

Hymagumba wrote:GE Money, purveyor of Topman/Burtons/Debenhams and many other store cards is also now owned by them and shall become Santander Cards Ltd.

No one expects a Spanish acquisition.

HSA are running their sock-puppet "Hey Just Say" adverts at the moment, saying on-screen but not announcing that they are to be renamed "Simply Health" or as it says on screen, "simplyhealth*".

Doesn't surprise me at all, what did however was the decision of Telefonica to retain the O2 brand (and expand it's use internationally) when they took over mmO2 several years ago.

DVB Cornwall wrote:Doesn't surprise me at all, what did however was the decision of Telefonica to retain the O2 brand (and expand it's use internationally) when they took over mmO2 several years ago.

O2 is so easily recognisable, it would have been a grave error to have pushed it all under the Telefonica umbrella.

So why is it OK for three very well known brands to be canned? I'm beginning to figure red as inherently bad for banks to use as a core colour of their brand.

Nini wrote:So why is it OK for three very well known brands to be canned? I'm beginning to figure red as inherently bad for banks to use as a core colour of their brand.

Both A+L and B+B were heavily featured in the press when parts of them collapsed. Think of it as a clean slate? Also, Santander is a global company, so people may think it's safer than smaller institutions.

I'll throw out a theoretical to you, had none of the institutions got bad press and were still standing then would it be reasonable then? One brand seems good to the consumer but it's more a "hey, look at me" towards other banks, gratuitous crotch-thrusting if you like.

No, If they all had good press, there would be no need, and It would not be a wise move. However, because they have all had bad press, a clean slate seems like the best option.

Nini wrote:I'll throw out a theoretical to you, had none of the institutions got bad press and were still standing then would it be reasonable then? One brand seems good to the consumer but it's more a "hey, look at me" towards other banks, gratuitous crotch-thrusting if you like.

If A&L and B&B hadn't effectively imploded as a result of the Banking sector's collapse neither would be in Santander's hands now and both would be still independent. Both were effectively rescued by Santander and for convenience rolled into Abbey's UK operation. I suspect if Abbey were still the stand alone representative of Santander in the UK then Santander wouldn't have been in such a hurry to rebrand.

DVB Cornwall wrote:If A&L and B&B hadn't effectively imploded as a result of the Banking sector's collapse neither would be in Santander's hands now and both would be still independent. Both were effectively rescued by Santander and for convenience rolled into Abbey's UK operation. I suspect if Abbey were still the stand alone representative of Santander in the UK then Santander wouldn't have been in such a hurry to rebrand.

I couldn't have put that better, thanks (: