Things people today find acceptable but which are not.

Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

I tend to do more sending than receiving these days anyway.
User avatar
Ronnie Rowlands
Posts: 956
Joined: Sun 15 Apr, 2007 14.50
Location: North Wales

I know plenty of intelligent, thoughtful people who use unsightly shorthand. Why think any less of someone for using it?
Ronnie is victorious, vivacious in victory like a venomous dog. Vile Republicans cease living while the religious retort with rueful rhetoric. These rank thugs resort to violence and swear revenge.

But Ronnie can punch through steel so they lose anyway.
User avatar
Cache
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun 16 Mar, 2008 17.19
Location: London

I too am not a fan of crap shorthand in texts and Facebook etc. I'm friends with my hairdresser on Facebook, and she insists oN taLkiN liKE tHis aalL tHe TImE, which is very annoying. She studied English at university, yet she feels the need to completely disregard all grammar, punctuation and so on when she gets on Facebook.

I see death threats, abuse and extreme racism in Facebook comments on pages I've liked; our local paper attracts many. I think people see Facebook as an informal alternative, as I never see the comments on the paper's actual website. I've just taken to deleting or hiding things like that from my home feed.
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

I agree with the second half there, and in keeping with the topic it's the casual cruelty of people on the internet - particularly in the comments sections of newspaper articles both left and right. That said, there does seem to be more cruelty directed at large swathes of the humanity from Mail commenters whereas the Guardian ones just wish death on specific people.
Knight knight
Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

Ronnie Rowlands wrote:I know plenty of intelligent, thoughtful people who use unsightly shorthand. Why think any less of someone for using it?
I don't.
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

O RLY?
Chie wrote: I was so bemused when, after three months of thinking I knew her, she sent me a text message that looked something like this:
Knight knight
Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

Did I say she was less of a person for using shorthand? No; I said it bemused me.
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

Meh, fair enough. Not how I read it, particularly given the title of the thread.

I'm sure Rowlands will be along to pick up any minutiae in this exchange!
Knight knight
Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

To be honest, I'm confused about what the topic of the thread is supposed to be. Marksi said "I'm not complaining here about the content" so I assumed he must be complaining about the spelling and grammar, particularly as his favourite example was the worst for it. But I'm not sure now...
User avatar
Ronnie Rowlands
Posts: 956
Joined: Sun 15 Apr, 2007 14.50
Location: North Wales

Sput wrote: I'm sure Rowlands will be along to pick up any minutiae in this exchange!
Funny you should say that, Sput!

I was bemused at Chie saying "after three months of thinking I knew her", as though it were some sort of betrayal!
Ronnie is victorious, vivacious in victory like a venomous dog. Vile Republicans cease living while the religious retort with rueful rhetoric. These rank thugs resort to violence and swear revenge.

But Ronnie can punch through steel so they lose anyway.
Alexia
Posts: 3001
Joined: Sat 01 Oct, 2005 17.50

For a considered view, I present (TV's) Craig Ferguson and Stephen Fry in this landmark interview. (5:00 mins in)



The full interview starts here....
Please Respond