Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 09.09
oh well in that case...rfrancis51284 wrote:I would appreciate an end to this discussion now.
Page 2 of 3
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 09.36
I suspect that maybe, just MAYBE, an explanation is what the Metropolians are after.
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 09.37
Why should I offer an explanation? I copied people's blog entries, it was wrong, I apologised. End of discussion.Sput wrote:I suspect that maybe, just MAYBE, an explanation is what the Metropolians are after.
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 09.45
You're right. We shouldn't be interested in WHY you did something that seemed totally unnecessary and decidedly weird.
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 19.38
Have you never done anything you regret Sput? You would be a remarkable, and somewhat unbelievably unique individual, if you hadn't.Sput wrote:You're right. We shouldn't be interested in WHY you did something that seemed totally unnecessary and decidedly weird.
I'm sure you would have the ability to talk your way out of such a situation though.
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 19.39
quiet, plymouth.
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 19.40
*runs back to corner*all new Phil wrote:quiet, plymouth.
Better view from there!
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 20.00
Yes, but Rob hasn't so far. I too am awaiting an explanation for this henious theft.StuartPlymouth wrote: I'm sure you would have the ability to talk your way out of such a situation though.
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 20.39
From Rob's website. Hmm, fascist moderation, essentially.Some members will be aware of something that has surfaced on Metropol 24/7 about one of my other websites. Needless to say, I've requested the topic to be closed twice, and yet nothing has been done about.
Needless to say, there will be NO DISCUSSION of this on the forum. Anyone bringing this up will be warned.
Thank you.
Apart from that, you've done no favours by letting everyone know it's here.
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 23.26
From the blog site: http://www.rfrancis51284.uni.cc/Why?
So why did I do it? Honestly, I don't know. I've never done it before, and I never thought it would escalate into a sticky thread on a messageboard where several members are a bunch of twats. It was something that was wrong, and I know it's going to take some time for people to take me seriously. To be honest, it was down to lack of inspiration, I was bored, and wanted something to do. Not every entry was copied. I've now deleted the offending posts and I apologise profusely for any stress caused.
I'm posting this message in the hope that someone closes the thread, as it appears that my appeals for them to shut it have fallen on deaf ears.
If you can forgive me, I hope you continue reading the blog, as I'll be making more entries this week.
Thank you.
From the keyboard of Robert Francis at 12:49 PM
Re: Blogiarism *scandal*
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 23.55
No thank you. The blog is bloody boring as hell. The only reason nobody had spotted this scandal earlier is because the blog is so boring that nobody had looked at it for more than about two seconds.I hope you continue reading the blog, as I'll be making more entries this week.