Metropol

Hymagumba wrote:

James H wrote:Is it just me or are Matrix and BBC World cyber bumming? If you ever see one of their posts together, you'll know what I mean.

I can see someone else who seems to be attempting to cyberbum Nick Harvey, stalking around and reply after all his posts indeed...

But I'm the chosen [bbc] one as you can tell by the globe birthmark on my left nipple so naturally I have the right to stalk whoever I want.

I think the two of you have simply identified one of the current symptoms of the TV Forum malaise.

When I log on, I tend to look for threads which have recent replies from people I know will have posted something I will find interesting.

I ignore threads with recent replies just from the "unintellegentsia".

If I bother to read a thread, then, logically, I'm more likely to reply.

The result of my doing this, you two probably doing this, and presumably the unintelligentsia doing something similar, is the effect you notice.

Nick Harvey wrote:I think the two of you have simply identified one of the current symptoms of the TV Forum malaise.

When I log on, I tend to look for threads which have recent replies from people I know will have posted something I will find interesting.

I ignore threads with recent replies just from the "unintellegentsia".

If I bother to read a thread, then, logically, I'm more likely to reply.

The result of my doing this, you two probably doing this, and presumably the unintelligentsia doing something similar, is the effect you notice.

I tend to do the same thing. Well, excluding the Scotland Today thread - only because some of the posters are intelligently challenged and it's hard to avoid them.

Would anyone miss semen90210, or whatever he's called, if he was eaten by a lion or something? I would most certainly NOT be mourning. He gets on my tits. And all those people who ONLY post in the mocks forum, but only to give their opinion on mocks. Tards.

what about this GMc thing? He was very nasty *although he did make an apology* but he's still an annoying twat.

So is Andrew. I don't think I can take any more pro-ITV rants - I bet he votes Labour as well.

So there.

What can and what has Seamus contributed to the forum so far? Not only are these kids making it extremely difficult to view the forum, they are breaking up the flow of conversation in some parts with their inability to just keep up. I don't understand why anyone under the age of 16 should be allowed to sign up, and continue to post even now!

The mocks forum has reached a new low, even though nobody thought it could get any lower. Advice is given over and over and over and over and still people continue to completely ignore the most simple, clear and unmistakable rules that *somehow* are totally oblivious to them. There are only so many times you can say "text is too small" or "safe areas" before you lose your mind altogether, and even then, some little short-arse will come along and complain that you're not giving constructive advice.

</rant>

If it were any other forum, it's longest-serving members would now be long gone, TV Forum is lucky it's longest serving members are a bunch of obsessive-compulsives... no offence anyone.

Is it me or do the children don't know when to stop? I felt ill surfing the mocks section yesterday because it seems that jamesh_1993 has taken msk91s role as the annoying mocker that won't stop until he gets banned.

One way or another I wanted msk91 to leave because he was poorly threatening luke-h to admit that his crappy mock is better than his improvement.


http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forum/viewforum.php?f=4

Why do those threads not get deleted when they are clogging the entire mocks forum?

Why aren't the cunts banned? I think we need a revolution, let's all overthrow Asa and his governing team... I say we get shut of Ison first and pick off the rest one by one. It could be a bit like Kill Bill, except I'm prettier than The Bride.

all new Phil wrote:Why aren't the cunts banned? I think we need a revolution, let's all overthrow Asa and his governing team... I say we get shut of Ison first and pick off the rest one by one. It could be a bit like Kill Bill, except I'm prettier than The Bride.

The 'A TV station run by TV Forumers' thread is quite worrying to read.

On another point, somehow I've managed to contribute 2000 posts over the past three years. Is this a worrying sign?

Antz wrote:

all new Phil wrote:Why aren't the cunts banned? I think we need a revolution, let's all overthrow Asa and his governing team... I say we get shut of Ison first and pick off the rest one by one. It could be a bit like Kill Bill, except I'm prettier than The Bride.

The 'A TV station run by TV Forumers' thread is quite worrying to read.

On another point, somehow I've managed to contribute 2000 posts over the past three years. Is this a worrying sign?

It's only worrying if you take it seriously, which I certainly didn't with my post.