Page 2 of 4
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 12.41
by noelfirl
Christ. I actually find it very difficult to browse that site due to the incessant number of nostrils looking down at me that keep appearing on every page.
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 14.50
by MarkN
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 15.31
by iSon
The mantra is inspired:
The Hanson's say:
"What it does best is to enthuse others into doing things they perhaps don't want to do."
You and I of course would just say:
"Do it you lazy shit."
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 15.52
by James H
funny
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 16.38
by look
Looks rather like "Pompus 'R' Us " to me.
Is this some kind of joke or something. The whole family look something from a freek show, or have had plastic surgery to turn their noses up . :roll:
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 17.05
by Gavin Scott
I think we're all being a little unkind.
By that I mean you lot.
Ok, so they have enough money and resources to have a bit of fun. Good for them that's what I say.
There. I shall get into heaven now.
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 17.24
by tvmercia
Gavin Scott wrote:I think we're all being a little unkind.
By that I mean you lot.
Ok, so they have enough money and resources to have a bit of fun. Good for them that's what I say.
There. I shall get into heaven now.
aah but they are parading their "fun" for all to see, publishing it you could say. and of course when you publish something you can expect to get feedback. perhaps an intranet with all this tat on would have been more appropriate, alternatively they could get a life.
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 17.50
by Square Eyes
What a vulgar spelling mistake.
It's ' boundaries ' darling. Have the Supreme Commander write me a cheque for my spelling consultancy fee.
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 18.19
by Lee
Gavin Scott wrote:I think we're all being a little unkind.
By that I mean you lot.
Ok, so they have enough money and resources to have a bit of fun. Good for them that's what I say.
There. I shall get into heaven now.
I'm all for them having fun and indeed kindness doesn't kill, but a polite please and thankyou for using a couple of mocks from my site would not have gone amiss either. I care little about the mocks or I would've emailed them, but for a group of people that seem quite proud of who they are, what they do and what they achieve, I would have expected the same level of respect every other person has given to me and what I do. Hey ho.
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 18.56
by Pete
tvmercia wrote:Gavin Scott wrote:I think we're all being a little unkind.
By that I mean you lot.
Ok, so they have enough money and resources to have a bit of fun. Good for them that's what I say.
There. I shall get into heaven now.
aah but they are parading their "fun" for all to see, publishing it you could say. and of course when you publish something you can expect to get feedback. perhaps an intranet with all this tat on would have been more appropriate, alternatively they could get a life.
it seems to have halfway through those "family newsletters" that some losers do and a fun intranet.
All the same though, it's our Nick Harvey given right to mock them for all it's worth.
Posted: Wed 08 Mar, 2006 19.43
by Nick Harvey
Gavin Scott wrote:There. I shall get into heaven now.
Applications please, on the back of a £50 note, to the usual address.