Posted: Sun 05 Mar, 2006 23.43
[/quote][/quote][/quote]
Page 2 of 5
Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 00.17
[/quote][/quote][/quote]Chris wrote:
[/quote]
Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 00.35
I've got some exciting news . . .
But I've forgotten what it was.
But I've forgotten what it was.
Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 00.36
I'll probably remember what it was eventually.
Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 00.37
Wait ... it's coming back to me now ...
Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 00.38
Err . . .
Hmm ...
Nope, it's gone again!
Hmm ...
Nope, it's gone again!
Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 00.38
FECK!
Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 02.12
:arrow::arrow::arrow::D:lol:Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 05.58
Tut tut. Missing apostrophe in paragraph 2 of the March Comment. Not what we expect from God really.Nick Harvey wrote:How about shameless hit count increases?
Are they allowed as well?
Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 11.35
Interesting.
Couldn't find a missing apostrophe, but DID find a missing "s" after the apostrophe which WAS there.
It has now been added; many thanks.
I cite in my defence a new version of FrontPage which is currently failing every other word in the spoll chack, so it's difficult to find the wheat within the chaff.
Anyway, that's MY story and I'm sticking to it!
Couldn't find a missing apostrophe, but DID find a missing "s" after the apostrophe which WAS there.
It has now been added; many thanks.
I cite in my defence a new version of FrontPage which is currently failing every other word in the spoll chack, so it's difficult to find the wheat within the chaff.
Anyway, that's MY story and I'm sticking to it!
Posted: Mon 06 Mar, 2006 11.41
D'oh!! How right you are. That'll teach me to try and be a smart-arse.Nick Harvey wrote:Couldn't find a missing apostrophe, but DID find a missing "s" after the apostrophe which WAS there.
I'll get me coat.