Page 2 of 4

Posted: Sat 29 Oct, 2005 21.01
by Sput
"daddy" may hark back to a certain mock about Max...

Posted: Sat 29 Oct, 2005 21.25
by James H
Sput wrote:"daddy" may hark back to a certain mock about Max...
he did say something about "you created a mock in which someone gave oral sex to a member of his family"

Posted: Sat 29 Oct, 2005 21.52
by Chris
nodnirG kraM wrote:This person clearly has some form of unstability which could be an innocent form of obsessive compusiveness or autism; or could be something alltogether more dangerous.
Well, if it was Maximillian, then the above profile could be right. I have just visited what appears to be his forum - 168 sub-boards covering every subject that he appears to like.

Now, I'd like to think that most forums would have some sort of organisation, but the problem with his is that he receives next to no visitors, and, well, unless a forum is very very big I would think 168 sub forums is a tad ott, do you not think?

:?

Re: FAO: The so-called moderating team

Posted: Sat 29 Oct, 2005 22.14
by Nick Harvey
Jamez wrote:That narrows it down to:
And the man in the cowboy hat! Except that I couldn't care a twopenny toss.

I can't see it being Max (hey son, put this in your mouth), it's rather too literate for that ignorant little idiot.

Re: FAO: The so-called moderating team

Posted: Sat 29 Oct, 2005 22.28
by Jamez
Nick Harvey wrote:
Jamez wrote:That narrows it down to:
And the man in the cowboy hat! Except that I couldn't care a twopenny toss.

I can't see it being Max (hey son, put this in your mouth), it's rather too literate for that ignorant little idiot.
The cowboy hat wasn't my work, Nicola! :D

Posted: Sat 29 Oct, 2005 22.29
by Nick Harvey
No, but I think you've had a gentle pop since, though.

Re: FAO: The so-called moderating team

Posted: Sat 29 Oct, 2005 22.41
by James H
Nick Harvey wrote:
Jamez wrote:That narrows it down to:
And the man in the cowboy hat! Except that I couldn't care a twopenny toss.

I can't see it being Max (hey son, put this in your mouth), it's rather too literate for that ignorant little idiot.
what about his dad then?

Posted: Sat 29 Oct, 2005 22.42
by Johnny
I've always been in favour of free speech on here & find alot of the comments on here funny but I have to admit that Bones / Sideshow Ed 2 (never saw Dusty Jacket's comments on here but presume they were of the same strand) do go a bit too far and are not funny at all alot of the times.

Posted: Sat 29 Oct, 2005 22.46
by Nick Harvey
Johnny wrote:go a bit too far and are not funny at all alot of the times.
EXACTLY my thoughts, Johnny.

Well said.

Posted: Sun 30 Oct, 2005 01.00
by babyben
I think you deserve whatever trolling nonsense gets thrown at your James.

It's not your are the little innocent here? Your just annoyed at someone who doesn't bow to your super-media (well, ish..) non-gay (ha!) ego.

Reading this thread you'd think it was a serious matter.. it's not, if you have a life off M24/7.

Posted: Sun 30 Oct, 2005 01.28
by Jamez
babyben wrote:I think you deserve whatever trolling nonsense gets thrown at your James.

It's not your are the little innocent here? Your just annoyed at someone who doesn't bow to your super-media (well, ish..) non-gay (ha!) ego.

Reading this thread you'd think it was a serious matter.. it's not, if you have a life off M24/7.
If you bothered to read this thread, you would see that I have specifically said that I dislike the fact that someone is too cowardly to confront me directly under their true identity.

Any little shit can hide behind fake usernames and avatars.