Page 2 of 3
Re: What Would You Like in Your Xmas Stocking This Year.
Posted: Fri 01 Oct, 2004 00.05
by Dr Lobster*
Jamez wrote:
Maybe if I took a leaf out of CraigF's book and photoshopped my face onto someone elses hunky body and used the brush tool in Photoshop to create 'sideburns' and 'stubble', I would be the sexbomb Craig quite obviously thinks he is too.
Although I finished puberty some while ago, so I don't need any kind of digital trickery to make myself look like Simon Weston after a night snorting coke.
http://craigf87.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
You will either laugh at Craigs pathetic photoshopping attempts, or feel pity. I however, just think he's a 24 carat cunt.
Tumm teee tummm...
must admit, looking at the side burns there does seem to be some repetition in the pattern - maybe just the burners are added on later. the picture of his body in the field, if it is a fraud, is a very good fraud.
edit: the bone structure and hair on the chest does seem to differ in each picture. hmmmm. really not sure about that one.
Posted: Sat 02 Oct, 2004 20.46
by Pete
his face always looked wrong to me, the fancial features didn't seem to go with each other.
Posted: Sun 03 Oct, 2004 15.17
by Dr Lobster*
craig's avatar and personal webpage seem to have been removed, although i still have the both photos in my proxy server cache - i've had a look at the two images, and it seems a few of the facial features don't line up, indeed, the ears seem to be different in each image.
also, the eyebrows in the side view seem to have been re-touched or extended. i also cannot make the position of the nose, ears, eyes to line up. my tests were less than scientific, but initial analysis suggests those pictures may actually be of two completely different people.
Posted: Sun 03 Oct, 2004 15.20
by Chris
Dr Sigmund Mohammad wrote:craig's avatar and personal webpage seem to have been removed, although i still have them in my proxy server cache - i've had a look at the two images, and it seems a few of the facial features don't line up, indeed, the ears on both pictures seem to be from a different person.
Hmm ... CraigF = the new Jaron Brass?

Posted: Sun 03 Oct, 2004 18.31
by Jamez
Indeed so, Chris.
Why does it always seem to fall upon me to expose the frauds and tosspots on these forums?

Posted: Tue 05 Oct, 2004 10.54
by Dr Lobster*
craig, i've noticed you've gone silent on this one? is this correct then?
Posted: Tue 05 Oct, 2004 21.31
by fusionlad
Dr Sigmund Mohammad wrote:craig's avatar and personal webpage seem to have been removed, although i still have the both photos in my proxy server cache - i've had a look at the two images, and it seems a few of the facial features don't line up, indeed, the ears seem to be different in each image.
also, the eyebrows in the side view seem to have been re-touched or extended. i also cannot make the position of the nose, ears, eyes to line up. my tests were less than scientific, but initial analysis suggests those pictures may actually be of two completely different people.
Let's have a look then, post them up

Posted: Tue 05 Oct, 2004 23.15
by Cheese Head
Jenny wrote:Gavin Scott wrote:Socks are so dull that I never ever think to buy a pair. They are a godsend once a year.
No. no no. You can't have socks
in stockings. One or the other, m'dear.
I'll happily accept those really cool rainbow toe socks. they rock!
Posted: Wed 06 Oct, 2004 13.30
by Col
Apart from the usual items I always seem to get (underwear, Guinness Book of Records, money...), I'm going all boring and asking for stuff for my new flat

Posted: Wed 06 Oct, 2004 17.59
by Dr Lobster*
fusionlad wrote:Dr Sigmund Mohammad wrote:craig's avatar and personal webpage seem to have been removed, although i still have the both photos in my proxy server cache - i've had a look at the two images, and it seems a few of the facial features don't line up, indeed, the ears seem to be different in each image.
also, the eyebrows in the side view seem to have been re-touched or extended. i also cannot make the position of the nose, ears, eyes to line up. my tests were less than scientific, but initial analysis suggests those pictures may actually be of two completely different people.
Let's have a look then, post them up


there we go
Posted: Wed 06 Oct, 2004 18.43
by fusionlad
Dr Sigmund Mohammad wrote:fusionlad wrote:Dr Sigmund Mohammad wrote:craig's avatar and personal webpage seem to have been removed, although i still have the both photos in my proxy server cache - i've had a look at the two images, and it seems a few of the facial features don't line up, indeed, the ears seem to be different in each image.
also, the eyebrows in the side view seem to have been re-touched or extended. i also cannot make the position of the nose, ears, eyes to line up. my tests were less than scientific, but initial analysis suggests those pictures may actually be of two completely different people.
Let's have a look then, post them up


there we go
Hmm... you're right... unless he's got removable ears. Different chest hair pattern too.