Could it be that, as media savvy as Cameron clearly is, he recognises that the sniff of a familiar face is better than no face at all. I couldn't name the shadow cabinet at gunpoint.Sput wrote:Well yes but my point is that for someone who supposedly doesn't reflect the new progressive conservative party, he's certainly being allowed a lot of airtime. I'd have thought someone as media savvy as cameron would have kept him on a pretty short leash after the NHS comments.
This serves to reinforce my disquiet about media culture applied to political campaigning. Not a new thing by any means, but now its less reliant on "soundbites", and instead feeds into the apparent 10-second memory of today's citizen.
Its really quite insulting. Am I to look at this tosser and say, "Oh I know him. I remember his face - yeh I'll vote for them"? Is that how the masses think? Even if it is, doesn't that make them tossers by playing right into it - before the eyes of the upper-quartile who see what they're playing at?
That may be the media savvy button to push for mass recognition in this day and age, but it doesn't fill me with confidence about those behind it. It does the opposite.
Blair was the king of spin (complete with the works of Campbell and Mandleson, of course), but he had a definitive agenda. When the Sun backed him in 97, they relayed the crafted musings of the spin men, and laid it out for us to consider.
This time, in supporting the Tories, they lead with, "Brown has lost it".
Another sign of the times. Perhaps its more effective to say, "don't vote for the one you recognise - vote for the other one".