Useless American Satellite

User avatar
marksi
Posts: 1892
Joined: Wed 07 Jan, 2004 05.38
Location: Donaghadee

You'll have heard about USA193, the satellite that didn't work when launched, which the Americans are planning to shoot down tonight before it crashes to earth itself.

Here's the graphic published by the Belfast Telegraph to accompany this story.

Image

Presumably they paid Chris Morris and The Day Today team something for it...
Nini
Banned
Posts: 1617
Joined: Fri 19 Oct, 2007 17.14

If only in homage alone... that is both saddening and hilarious at the same time.
Jamez
Banned
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sun 30 May, 2004 23.02
Location: Bristol

ROFL!

Fabulous!
User Removed
timgraham
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun 15 Jul, 2007 02.26
Location: Melbourne, Australia

It's going to be raining nuts and bolts up and down central Australia as well.

The US government still hasn't paid the littering fine for the debris from Skylab all those years ago so I suspect that attempts at getting compensation will be futile.

EDIT: News.com.au handle the story with their trademark sublety:
http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata ... 433,00.jpg
User avatar
Gavin Scott
Admin
Posts: 6442
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

That illustration is fab!
Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

Deleted
User removed
User avatar
Mr Q
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue 05 Sep, 2006 11.31
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

I like how some in the US are now taking this as proof that their missile defence system works. I'm not an expert, but I suspect shooting down a satellite which you know is falling and have been able to make plans to deal with is slightly different to having to defend yourself from a missile fired at you by an enemy state without direct warning. But maybe I'm missing something.
Image
Charlie Wells
Posts: 389
Joined: Tue 02 Nov, 2004 16.23
Location: Cambridgeshire

I cynically think that the reason for shooting it down isn't due to the fuel but because they don't know where it may land, and they don't want others to be able to see what technology is within the satellite. Blowing it to pieces ensures that others can't easily get their hands on it. I dread to think how much junk is floating around our planet.
"If ass holes could fly then this place would be an airport."
User avatar
Mr Q
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue 05 Sep, 2006 11.31
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Charlie Wells wrote:I cynically think that the reason for shooting it down isn't due to the fuel but because they don't know where it may land, and they don't want others to be able to see what technology is within the satellite. Blowing it to pieces ensures that others can't easily get their hands on it.
There's probably more than an element of truth to that. It was a spy satellite - it's not unreasonable to expect that it might have some 'secret' technology on it that the US wouldn't want others to get their hands on.
I dread to think how much junk is floating around our planet.
Well, as I understand it, the debris from this satellite will come back to earth (or burn up in the atmosphere) within the next week or two, so it shouldn't add to the space junk orbiting the planet. You raise a valid poin though, and The Economist had an interesting report on this recently. I think it's an issue that's attracted a lot of attention since the Chinese blew up an old weather satellite in January. That incident resulted in a significant increase in the detritus floating around earth - and that stuff could be up there for up to 100 years. The fundamental problem is we don't have any rules on 'littering' in space. It might be reckless and irresponsible, but there's nothing stopping any country from doing it at the moment.
Image
Please Respond